QQQX vs. UMH

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

QQQX (Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq 100 Index, while UMH (UMH Properties, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, QQQX returned 13.33%/yr vs 9.35%/yr for UMH. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

QQQX vs. UMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX) and UMH Properties, Inc. (UMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQX achieves a 11.14% return, which is significantly higher than UMH's -2.49% return. Over the past 10 years, QQQX has outperformed UMH with an annualized return of 13.33%, while UMH has yielded a comparatively lower 9.35% annualized return.

QQQX

• 1D: -0.61%
• 1M: 2.18%
• YTD: 11.14%
• 6M: 14.21%
• 1Y: 32.80%
• 3Y*: 15.49%
• 5Y*: 9.44%
• 10Y*: 13.33%

UMH

• 1D: 1.76%
• 1M: -2.57%
• YTD: -2.49%
• 6M: 1.46%
• 1Y: -4.43%
• 3Y*: 3.96%
• 5Y*: -2.61%
• 10Y*: 9.35%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQX vs. UMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
QQQX Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund	11.14%	14.87%	25.61%	21.68%	-27.39%	25.32%	15.75%	28.83%	-11.68%	39.19%
UMH UMH Properties, Inc.	-2.49%	-11.02%	29.59%	0.21%	-38.67%	91.34%	-0.73%	40.13%	-16.21%	3.70%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQX and UMH is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.31
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2007	0.30

Over the past year, the correlation between QQQX and UMH has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.30, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap QQQX : $1.39B UMH : $1.29B
EPS QQQX : $7.57 UMH : $0.25
PE Ratio QQQX : 3.75 UMH : 59.31
PEG Ratio QQQX : 0.43 UMH : 0.74
PS Ratio QQQX : 8.63 UMH : 6.40
PB Ratio QQQX : 1.01 UMH : 2.26
Total Revenue (TTM) QQQX : $160.60M UMH : $200.53M
Gross Profit (TTM) QQQX : $152.14M UMH : $74.67M
EBITDA (TTM) QQQX : $369.75M UMH : $95.11M

Return for Risk

QQQX vs. UMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQX

QQQX Risk / Return Rank: 68
QQQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
QQQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
QQQX Omega Ratio Rank: 57
QQQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
QQQX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

UMH

UMH Risk / Return Rank: 30
UMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
UMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
UMH Omega Ratio Rank: 27
UMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
UMH Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQX vs. UMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX) and UMH Properties, Inc. (UMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QQQX	UMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.24	-0.23	+2.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.25	-0.19	+3.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	0.98	+0.44
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.61	-0.26	+3.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.87	-0.49	+17.36
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QQQX vs. UMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQX Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is higher than the UMH Sharpe Ratio of -0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQX and UMH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QQQX	UMH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.24	-0.23	+2.47
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48	-0.10	+0.58
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.63	0.31	+0.32
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.48	0.33	+0.15

Drawdowns

QQQX vs. UMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQX drawdown since its inception was -57.25%, smaller than the maximum UMH drawdown of -62.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQX and UMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQQX	UMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.25%	-62.46%	+5.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.11%	-17.43%	+8.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.80%	-27.28%	+4.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.33%	-46.98%	+17.65%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.96%	-46.98%	+11.02%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.36%	-30.90%	+28.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.02%	-14.54%	+6.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.95%	9.07%	-7.12%

Volatility

QQQX vs. UMH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX) is 4.31%, while UMH Properties, Inc. (UMH) has a volatility of 6.17%. This indicates that QQQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQQX	UMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.31%	6.17%	-1.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.58%	14.01%	-2.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.71%	19.32%	-4.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.82%	25.27%	-5.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.06%	29.94%	-8.88%

Dividends

QQQX vs. UMH - Dividend Comparison

QQQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.40%, more than UMH's 5.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QQQX Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund	7.40%	7.85%	6.73%	7.26%	9.66%	5.85%	6.00%	6.49%	8.40%	5.95%	7.54%	7.23%
UMH UMH Properties, Inc.	5.97%	5.59%	4.50%	5.35%	4.97%	2.78%	4.86%	4.58%	6.08%	4.83%	4.78%	7.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQQX and UMH in my portfolio?

QQQX and UMH have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QQQX or UMH?

UMH has higher volatility (6.17%) compared to QQQX (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQX dropped -57.25% vs UMH's -62.46%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.