PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UMH vs. O
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

UMH vs. O - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UMH Properties, Inc. (UMH) and Realty Income Corporation (O). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UMH achieves a -4.18% return, which is significantly lower than O's 8.26% return. Over the past 10 years, UMH has outperformed O with an annualized return of 9.14%, while O has yielded a comparatively lower 4.58% annualized return.


UMH

1D
-1.27%
1M
-4.01%
YTD
-4.18%
6M
1.57%
1Y
-6.08%
3Y*
3.16%
5Y*
-2.94%
10Y*
9.14%

O

1D
-0.32%
1M
-5.46%
YTD
8.26%
6M
5.55%
1Y
12.57%
3Y*
5.73%
5Y*
2.47%
10Y*
4.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UMH vs. O - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UMH
UMH Properties, Inc.
-4.18%-11.02%29.59%0.21%-38.67%91.34%-0.73%40.13%-16.21%3.70%
O
Realty Income Corporation
8.26%12.20%-2.11%-4.55%-7.38%23.95%-11.60%21.27%15.94%3.67%

Correlation

The correlation between UMH and O is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 1994

0.28

The correlation between UMH and O shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (all time) to 0.55 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

UMH:

$0.25

O:

$1.17

PE Ratio

UMH:

58.29

O:

50.86

PEG Ratio

UMH:

0.73

O:

4.14

PS Ratio

UMH:

6.29

O:

6.87

Total Revenue (TTM)

UMH:

$200.53M

O:

$5.92B

Gross Profit (TTM)

UMH:

$74.67M

O:

$3.89B

EBITDA (TTM)

UMH:

$95.11M

O:

$3.93B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UMH vs. O — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UMH
UMH Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
UMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
UMH Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
UMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
UMH Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

O
O Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
O Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
O Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
O Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
O Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
O Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UMH vs. O - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UMH Properties, Inc. (UMH) and Realty Income Corporation (O). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UMHODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.14

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.35

1.14

-1.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.67

2.88

-3.56

UMH vs. O - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UMH Sharpe Ratio is -0.32, which is lower than the O Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UMH and O, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UMHODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.32

0.79

-1.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.12

0.13

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

0.18

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.48

-0.16

Drawdowns

UMH vs. O - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UMH drawdown since its inception was -62.46%, which is greater than O's maximum drawdown of -48.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMH and O.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UMHODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.46%

-48.45%

-14.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.43%

-11.10%

-6.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.28%

-26.49%

-0.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.98%

-34.48%

-12.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.98%

-48.28%

+1.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.09%

-10.44%

-21.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.54%

-9.21%

-5.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.05%

4.37%

+4.68%

Volatility

UMH vs. O - Volatility Comparison

UMH Properties, Inc. (UMH) has a higher volatility of 5.87% compared to Realty Income Corporation (O) at 5.48%. This indicates that UMH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than O based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UMHODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.87%

5.48%

+0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.90%

11.72%

+2.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.24%

15.95%

+3.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.25%

18.87%

+6.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.94%

25.63%

+4.31%

Dividends

UMH vs. O - Dividend Comparison

UMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.08%, more than O's 5.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
O
Realty Income Corporation
5.42%6.19%5.37%5.33%4.68%3.87%4.51%3.69%4.19%4.45%4.18%4.41%
UMH
UMH Properties, Inc.
6.08%5.59%4.50%5.35%4.97%2.78%4.86%4.58%6.08%4.83%4.78%7.11%

Financials

UMH vs. O - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between UMH Properties, Inc. and Realty Income Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B202220232024202520260
1.55B
(UMH) Total Revenue
(O) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


UMH and O have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UMH has higher volatility (5.87%) compared to O (5.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UMH dropped -62.46% vs O's -48.45%.

O currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.79 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UMH and O

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer