PortfoliosLab logo
UMH vs. COLD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between UMH and COLD is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

UMH vs. COLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UMH Properties, Inc. (UMH) and Americold Realty Trust (COLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

UMH:

0.68

COLD:

-1.00

Sortino Ratio

UMH:

0.81

COLD:

-1.49

Omega Ratio

UMH:

1.10

COLD:

0.82

Calmar Ratio

UMH:

0.27

COLD:

-0.61

Martin Ratio

UMH:

1.38

COLD:

-1.47

Ulcer Index

UMH:

7.75%

COLD:

21.90%

Daily Std Dev

UMH:

22.17%

COLD:

31.01%

Max Drawdown

UMH:

-62.44%

COLD:

-52.95%

Current Drawdown

UMH:

-28.74%

COLD:

-52.95%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

UMH:

$1.38B

COLD:

$4.89B

EPS

UMH:

$0.12

COLD:

-$0.42

PEG Ratio

UMH:

-14.50

COLD:

4.03

PS Ratio

UMH:

5.65

COLD:

1.86

PB Ratio

UMH:

2.34

COLD:

1.53

Total Revenue (TTM)

UMH:

$244.10M

COLD:

$2.63B

Gross Profit (TTM)

UMH:

$134.13M

COLD:

$841.74M

EBITDA (TTM)

UMH:

$115.78M

COLD:

$366.77M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UMH achieves a -10.52% return, which is significantly higher than COLD's -20.57% return.


UMH

YTD

-10.52%

1M

-4.45%

6M

-12.20%

1Y

14.91%

3Y*

-1.04%

5Y*

11.27%

10Y*

10.85%

COLD

YTD

-20.57%

1M

-16.65%

6M

-25.61%

1Y

-30.87%

3Y*

-11.27%

5Y*

-10.84%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


UMH Properties, Inc.

Americold Realty Trust

Risk-Adjusted Performance

UMH vs. COLD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UMH
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of UMH is 6666
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of UMH is 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of UMH is 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of UMH is 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of UMH is 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of UMH is 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

COLD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of COLD is 88
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of COLD is 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of COLD is 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of COLD is 88
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of COLD is 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of COLD is 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

UMH vs. COLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UMH Properties, Inc. (UMH) and Americold Realty Trust (COLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current UMH Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is higher than the COLD Sharpe Ratio of -1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UMH and COLD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

UMH vs. COLD - Dividend Comparison

UMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.28%, which matches COLD's 5.29% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
UMH
UMH Properties, Inc.
5.28%4.50%5.35%4.97%2.78%4.86%4.58%6.08%4.83%4.78%7.11%7.54%
COLD
Americold Realty Trust
5.29%4.11%2.91%3.11%2.68%2.25%2.28%2.76%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

UMH vs. COLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UMH drawdown since its inception was -62.44%, which is greater than COLD's maximum drawdown of -52.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMH and COLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

UMH vs. COLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UMH Properties, Inc. (UMH) is 5.53%, while Americold Realty Trust (COLD) has a volatility of 10.58%. This indicates that UMH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

UMH vs. COLD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between UMH Properties, Inc. and Americold Realty Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M20212022202320242025
61.23M
628.98M
(UMH) Total Revenue
(COLD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

UMH vs. COLD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between UMH Properties, Inc. and Americold Realty Trust over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20212022202320242025
55.3%
32.7%
(UMH) Gross Margin
(COLD) Gross Margin
UMH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, UMH Properties, Inc. reported a gross profit of 33.85M and revenue of 61.23M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.3%.

COLD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Americold Realty Trust reported a gross profit of 205.85M and revenue of 628.98M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.7%.

UMH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, UMH Properties, Inc. reported an operating income of 9.57M and revenue of 61.23M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.6%.

COLD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Americold Realty Trust reported an operating income of 22.22M and revenue of 628.98M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.5%.

UMH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, UMH Properties, Inc. reported a net income of 4.86M and revenue of 61.23M, resulting in a net margin of 7.9%.

COLD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Americold Realty Trust reported a net income of -16.38M and revenue of 628.98M, resulting in a net margin of -2.6%.