UMH vs. COLD
UMH (UMH Properties, Inc.) and COLD (Americold Realty Trust) are both stocks. Both are in the Real Estate sector — UMH in REIT - Residential, COLD in REIT - Industrial. Over the past 5 years, UMH returned -3.74%/yr vs -14.93%/yr for COLD. Their 0.44 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
UMH vs. COLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UMH achieves a -2.23% return, which is significantly lower than COLD's 13.43% return.
UMH
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- -2.64%
- 6M
- -0.48%
- YTD
- -2.23%
- 1Y
- -1.35%
- 3Y*
- 2.39%
- 5Y*
- -3.74%
- 10Y*
- 7.46%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.77%
COLD
- 1D
- -2.56%
- 1M
- -13.24%
- 6M
- 17.54%
- YTD
- 13.43%
- 1Y
- -3.75%
- 3Y*
- -20.58%
- 5Y*
- -14.93%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 0.94%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $60.08M | $63.19M | $69.47M | |
| $6.81M | $6.99M | $10.07M |
UMH vs. COLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UMH UMH Properties, Inc. | -2.23% | -11.02% | 29.59% | 0.21% | -38.67% | 91.34% | -0.73% | 40.13% | -11.01% |
COLD Americold Realty Trust | 13.43% | -36.17% | -26.72% | 10.11% | -10.89% | -9.89% | 9.03% | 40.61% | 50.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between UMH and COLD is 0.41, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2018 | 0.44 |
The correlation between UMH and COLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.41 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
UMH:
$1.29B
COLD:
$4.02B
UMH:
$0.25
COLD:
-$0.39
UMH:
6.43
COLD:
1.55
UMH:
2.26
COLD:
1.43
UMH:
$200.53M
COLD:
$2.60B
UMH:
$74.67M
COLD:
-$101.19M
UMH:
$95.11M
COLD:
$311.42M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UMH vs. COLD — Risk / Return Rank
UMH
COLD
UMH vs. COLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UMH Properties, Inc. (UMH) and Americold Realty Trust (COLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UMH | COLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.02 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.12 | -0.16 | +0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.23 | -0.31 | +0.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UMH vs. COLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UMH drawdown since its inception was -62.46%, smaller than the maximum COLD drawdown of -70.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UMH and COLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UMH | COLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.46% | -70.76% | +8.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.95% | -37.29% | +23.34% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.28% | -67.06% | +39.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.98% | -69.52% | +22.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.71% | -57.12% | +26.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.61% | -22.88% | +8.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.06% | 19.25% | -12.19% |
Volatility
UMH vs. COLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UMH Properties, Inc. (UMH) is 6.24%, while Americold Realty Trust (COLD) has a volatility of 10.66%. This indicates that UMH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UMH | COLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.24% | 10.66% | -4.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.16% | 34.84% | -20.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.49% | 46.08% | -26.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.09% | 33.50% | -8.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.92% | 32.33% | -2.41% |
Dividends
UMH vs. COLD - Dividend Comparison
UMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.96%, less than COLD's 6.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COLD Americold Realty Trust | 6.53% | 7.15% | 4.11% | 2.91% | 3.11% | 2.68% | 2.25% | 2.28% | 2.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UMH UMH Properties, Inc. | 5.96% | 5.59% | 4.50% | 5.35% | 4.97% | 2.78% | 4.86% | 4.58% | 6.08% | 4.83% | 4.78% | 7.11% |
Financials
UMH vs. COLD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between UMH Properties, Inc. and Americold Realty Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
UMH and COLD have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COLD has higher volatility (10.66%) compared to UMH (6.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UMH dropped -62.46% vs COLD's -70.76%.
UMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.08 vs -0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UMH and COLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer