QQQP vs. UPSX
QQQP (Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF) and UPSX (Tradr 2X Long UPST Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Tradr. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, QQQP returned 47.44% vs -91.32% for UPSX. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 1.30% expense ratio.
Performance
QQQP vs. UPSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQP achieves a 24.11% return, which is significantly higher than UPSX's -63.96% return.
QQQP
- 1D
- -3.72%
- 1M
- -3.56%
- 6M
- 19.17%
- YTD
- 24.11%
- 1Y
- 47.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UPSX
- 1D
- -7.13%
- 1M
- 2.23%
- 6M
- -65.70%
- YTD
- -63.96%
- 1Y
- -91.32%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQP vs. UPSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QQQP Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF | 24.11% | 27.71% |
UPSX Tradr 2X Long UPST Daily ETF | -63.96% | -61.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQP and UPSX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2025 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQP vs. UPSX — Risk / Return Rank
QQQP
UPSX
QQQP vs. UPSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP) and Tradr 2X Long UPST Daily ETF (UPSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QQQP | UPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 0.84 | +0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.88 | -0.96 | +2.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.57 | -1.17 | +7.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QQQP vs. UPSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQP drawdown since its inception was -42.50%, smaller than the maximum UPSX drawdown of -95.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQP and UPSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQP | UPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.50% | -95.01% | +52.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.35% | -95.01% | +69.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.96% | -92.90% | +83.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.25% | -68.29% | +61.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.24% | 77.79% | -70.55% |
Volatility
QQQP vs. UPSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP) is 14.77%, while Tradr 2X Long UPST Daily ETF (UPSX) has a volatility of 33.31%. This indicates that QQQP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UPSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQP | UPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.77% | 33.31% | -18.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.96% | 101.18% | -72.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.67% | 138.49% | -102.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.38% | 139.13% | -94.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.38% | 139.13% | -94.75% |
QQQP vs. UPSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both QQQP and UPSX have an expense ratio of 1.30%.
Dividends
QQQP vs. UPSX - Dividend Comparison
Neither QQQP nor UPSX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQP and UPSX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UPSX has higher volatility (33.31%) compared to QQQP (14.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQP dropped -42.50% vs UPSX's -95.01%.
On 1-year performance, QQQP leads with 47.44% vs -91.32% for UPSX. Both ETFs have the same 1.30% expense ratio. On volatility, QQQP has been the lower-risk option at 14.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QQQP has performed better with a 47.44% return vs -91.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQP and UPSX have the same expense ratio: 1.30% per year.
QQQP and UPSX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
QQQP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQQP and UPSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer