QQQP vs. TSLQ
QQQP (Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF) and TSLQ (Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQP is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Tradr, while TSLQ is a Inverse Equities fund actively managed by Tradr. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, QQQP returned 37.33% vs -46.08% for TSLQ. Their -0.64 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. QQQP charges 1.30%/yr vs 1.17%/yr for TSLQ.
Performance
QQQP vs. TSLQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQP achieves a 15.23% return, which is significantly lower than TSLQ's 49.23% return.
QQQP
- 1D
- 1.56%
- 1M
- -7.63%
- 6M
- 13.12%
- YTD
- 15.23%
- 1Y
- 37.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 31.06%
TSLQ
- 1D
- -1.53%
- 1M
- 45.07%
- 6M
- 40.85%
- YTD
- 49.23%
- 1Y
- -46.08%
- 3Y*
- -60.20%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -54.61%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $865.31K | $566.51K | $438.05K | |
| $162.68M | $148.83M | $161.26M |
QQQP vs. TSLQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QQQP Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF | 15.23% | 30.21% | 9.30% |
TSLQ Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF | 49.23% | -74.67% | -74.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQP and TSLQ is -0.66, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2024 | -0.64 |
The correlation between QQQP and TSLQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.66 to -0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQP vs. TSLQ — Risk / Return Rank
QQQP
TSLQ
QQQP vs. TSLQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP) and Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSLQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QQQP | TSLQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 0.97 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.27 | -0.64 | +1.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.02 | -0.79 | +4.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QQQP vs. TSLQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQP drawdown since its inception was -42.50%, smaller than the maximum TSLQ drawdown of -98.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQP and TSLQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQP | TSLQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.50% | -98.73% | +56.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.35% | -69.32% | +43.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -97.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.47% | -97.78% | +82.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.46% | -68.42% | +60.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.01% | 55.83% | -47.82% |
Volatility
QQQP vs. TSLQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP) is 14.67%, while Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF (TSLQ) has a volatility of 36.98%. This indicates that QQQP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQP | TSLQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.67% | 36.98% | -22.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.88% | 67.32% | -36.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.67% | 92.69% | -55.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.67% | 95.64% | -50.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.67% | 95.64% | -50.97% |
QQQP vs. TSLQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQP has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLQ's 1.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQQP vs. TSLQ - Dividend Comparison
QQQP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSLQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.08%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQP Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSLQ Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF | 7.08% | 10.56% | 4.95% | 13.35% | 2.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQP and TSLQ have a correlation of -0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLQ has higher volatility (36.98%) compared to QQQP (14.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQP dropped -42.50% vs TSLQ's -98.73%.
On 1-year performance, QQQP leads with 37.33% vs -46.08% for TSLQ. On fees, TSLQ is cheaper at 1.17% per year. On volatility, QQQP has been the lower-risk option at 14.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QQQP has performed better with a 37.33% return vs -46.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSLQ is cheaper with a 1.17% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for QQQP.
TSLQ has the higher dividend yield at 7.08%, compared with 0.00% for QQQP.
QQQP is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TSLQ is Inverse Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for QQQP and 1.17% for TSLQ.
QQQP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQQP and TSLQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer