PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQP vs. SARK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQP vs. SARK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP) and Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQP achieves a 36.32% return, which is significantly higher than SARK's -8.86% return.


QQQP

1D
0.84%
1M
18.29%
YTD
36.32%
6M
32.45%
1Y
77.97%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SARK

1D
1.58%
1M
-4.44%
YTD
-8.86%
6M
-7.57%
1Y
-36.06%
3Y*
-31.26%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQP vs. SARK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QQQP
Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF
36.32%30.21%10.88%
SARK
Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF
-8.86%-25.93%-40.43%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQP and SARK is -0.70, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2024

-0.76

The correlation between QQQP and SARK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.76 to -0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQP vs. SARK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQP
QQQP Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
QQQP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQP Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQP Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

SARK
SARK Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
SARK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SARK Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
SARK Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
SARK Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
SARK Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQP vs. SARK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP) and Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQPSARKDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.45

-1.01

+3.46

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.94

-1.43

+4.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

0.84

+0.53

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

-0.91

+4.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.62

-1.22

+12.84

QQQP vs. SARK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQP Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is higher than the SARK Sharpe Ratio of -1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQP and SARK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQPSARKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.45

-1.01

+3.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.15

-0.25

+1.40

Drawdowns

QQQP vs. SARK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQP drawdown since its inception was -42.50%, smaller than the maximum SARK drawdown of -81.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQP and SARK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQPSARKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.50%

-81.07%

+38.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.35%

-40.75%

+15.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-74.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-79.88%

+79.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.35%

-46.43%

+39.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.92%

30.38%

-23.46%

Volatility

QQQP vs. SARK - Volatility Comparison

Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP) and Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK) have volatilities of 8.99% and 8.96%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQPSARKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.99%

8.96%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.63%

25.07%

-0.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.06%

35.86%

-3.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.85%

56.25%

-12.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.85%

56.25%

-12.40%

QQQP vs. SARK - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQP has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SARK's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQQP vs. SARK - Dividend Comparison

QQQP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SARK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.09%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
QQQP
Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SARK
Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF
3.09%2.82%15.49%12.57%25.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQP and SARK have a correlation of -0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQP has higher volatility (8.99%) compared to SARK (8.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQP dropped -42.50% vs SARK's -81.07%.

On 1-year performance, QQQP leads with 77.97% vs -36.06% for SARK. On fees, SARK is cheaper at 0.75% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQQP has performed better with a 77.97% return vs -36.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SARK is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for QQQP.

SARK has the higher dividend yield at 3.09%, compared with 0.00% for QQQP.

QQQP is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SARK is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: Tradr and AXS. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for QQQP and 0.75% for SARK.

QQQP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs -1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQP and SARK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer