PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQP vs. QUBX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQP vs. QUBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP) and Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF (QUBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQP achieves a 24.11% return, which is significantly higher than QUBX's -66.76% return.


QQQP

1D
-3.72%
1M
-3.56%
6M
19.17%
YTD
24.11%
1Y
47.44%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QUBX

1D
-14.37%
1M
-40.56%
6M
-75.55%
YTD
-66.76%
1Y
-93.87%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQP vs. QUBX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
QQQP
Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF
24.11%27.41%
QUBX
Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF
-66.76%-83.01%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQP and QUBX is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQP vs. QUBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQP
QQQP Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
QQQP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQP Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQP Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

QUBX
QUBX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
QUBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUBX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
QUBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUBX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQP vs. QUBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP) and Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF (QUBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QQQPQUBXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

0.93

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

-0.97

+2.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.57

-1.21

+7.78

QQQP vs. QUBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQP Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is higher than the QUBX Sharpe Ratio of -0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQP and QUBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQQP vs. QUBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQP drawdown since its inception was -42.50%, smaller than the maximum QUBX drawdown of -96.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQP and QUBX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQPQUBXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.50%

-96.40%

+53.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.35%

-96.40%

+71.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.96%

-95.96%

+87.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.25%

-71.85%

+64.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.24%

77.47%

-70.23%

Volatility

QQQP vs. QUBX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP) is 14.77%, while Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF (QUBX) has a volatility of 52.89%. This indicates that QQQP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QUBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQPQUBXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.77%

52.89%

-38.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.96%

133.18%

-104.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.67%

200.09%

-164.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.38%

199.02%

-154.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.38%

199.02%

-154.64%

QQQP vs. QUBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QQQP and QUBX have an expense ratio of 1.30%.


Dividends

QQQP vs. QUBX - Dividend Comparison

Neither QQQP nor QUBX has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQP and QUBX have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QUBX has higher volatility (52.89%) compared to QQQP (14.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQP dropped -42.50% vs QUBX's -96.40%.

On 1-year performance, QQQP leads with 47.44% vs -93.87% for QUBX. Both ETFs have the same 1.30% expense ratio. On volatility, QQQP has been the lower-risk option at 14.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQQP has performed better with a 47.44% return vs -93.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQP and QUBX have the same expense ratio: 1.30% per year.

QQQP and QUBX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

QQQP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQP and QUBX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer