PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QUBX vs. GEVG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QUBX vs. GEVG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF (QUBX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long GEV Daily ETF (GEVG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QUBX achieves a -25.88% return, which is significantly lower than GEVG's 88.18% return.


QUBX

1D
-16.53%
1M
20.88%
YTD
-25.88%
6M
-51.09%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GEVG

1D
-2.09%
1M
-22.22%
YTD
88.18%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QUBX vs. GEVG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
QUBX
Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF
-25.88%-20.67%
GEVG
Leverage Shares 2X Long GEV Daily ETF
88.18%-11.09%

Correlation

The correlation between QUBX and GEVG is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2025

0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QUBX vs. GEVG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF (QUBX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long GEV Daily ETF (GEVG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QUBX vs. GEVG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QUBXGEVGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.44

2.17

-2.61

Drawdowns

QUBX vs. GEVG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QUBX drawdown since its inception was -96.40%, which is greater than GEVG's maximum drawdown of -33.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QUBX and GEVG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QUBXGEVGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.40%

-33.81%

-62.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-91.00%

-32.62%

-58.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.71%

-9.25%

-60.46%

Volatility

QUBX vs. GEVG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QUBXGEVGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

200.76%

96.61%

+104.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

200.76%

96.61%

+104.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

200.76%

96.61%

+104.15%

QUBX vs. GEVG - Expense Ratio Comparison

QUBX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than GEVG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

QUBX vs. GEVG - Dividend Comparison

Neither QUBX nor GEVG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


QUBX and GEVG have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GEVG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GEVG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for QUBX.

QUBX and GEVG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for QUBX and 0.75% for GEVG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QUBX and GEVG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer