QQQP vs. LRCU

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

QQQP (Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF) and LRCU (Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Tradr. Both are actively managed. Their 0.73 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 1.30% expense ratio.

Performance

QQQP vs. LRCU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP) and Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQP achieves a 15.23% return, which is significantly lower than LRCU's 107.47% return.

QQQP

• 1D: 1.56%
• 1M: -7.63%
• 6M: 13.12%
• YTD: 15.23%
• 1Y: 37.33%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 31.06%

LRCU

• 1D: -2.75%
• 1M: -34.72%
• 6M: 16.91%
• YTD: 107.47%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF	$6.88M	$9.18M	$9.25M
QQQP Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF	$865.31K	$566.51K	$438.05K

QQQP vs. LRCU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QQQP Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF	15.23%	10.26%
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF	107.47%	172.36%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQP and LRCU is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025	0.73

Return for Risk

QQQP vs. LRCU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QQQP

QQQP Risk / Return Rank: 36
QQQP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
QQQP Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
QQQP Omega Ratio Rank: 34
QQQP Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
QQQP Martin Ratio Rank: 38

LRCU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QQQP vs. LRCU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP) and Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QQQP	LRCU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.86	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.35	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.27	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.02	—	—

Drawdowns

QQQP vs. LRCU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQP drawdown since its inception was -42.50%, smaller than the maximum LRCU drawdown of -68.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQP and LRCU.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQQP	LRCU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.50%	-68.68%	+26.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.35%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.47%	-58.17%	+42.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.46%	-12.70%	+5.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.01%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QQQP	LRCU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.67%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.88%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.67%	129.81%	-92.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.67%	129.81%	-85.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	44.67%	129.81%	-85.14%

QQQP vs. LRCU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QQQP and LRCU have an expense ratio of 1.30%.

Dividends

QQQP vs. LRCU - Dividend Comparison

Neither QQQP nor LRCU has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQQP and LRCU in my portfolio?

QQQP and LRCU have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QQQP or LRCU?

Both ETFs have the same 1.30% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQQP or LRCU?

QQQP and LRCU have the same expense ratio: 1.30% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQQP or LRCU?

QQQP and LRCU have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.