QQQM vs. XMMO
QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) and XMMO (Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQM is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while XMMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QQQM returned 15.05%/yr vs 13.92%/yr for XMMO. Their 0.70 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. QQQM charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XMMO.
Performance
QQQM vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQM achieves a 17.07% return, which is significantly higher than XMMO's 15.38% return.
QQQM
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- -0.73%
- 6M
- 18.73%
- YTD
- 17.07%
- 1Y
- 28.72%
- 3Y*
- 25.27%
- 5Y*
- 15.05%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 17.31%
XMMO
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- -3.38%
- 6M
- 13.16%
- YTD
- 15.38%
- 1Y
- 23.91%
- 3Y*
- 25.50%
- 5Y*
- 13.92%
- 10Y*
- 18.39%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.27%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.17B | $981.56M | $1.20B | |
| $62.05M | $68.99M | $66.59M |
QQQM vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 17.07% | 20.85% | 25.68% | 55.01% | -32.52% | 27.45% | 6.64% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 15.38% | 13.04% | 38.03% | 20.39% | -16.02% | 16.69% | 10.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQM and XMMO is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2020 | 0.70 |
The correlation between QQQM and XMMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.
QQQM vs. XMMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QQQM
XMMO
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
Technology
QQQM
XMMO
Communication Services
QQQM
XMMO
Consumer Cyclical
QQQM
XMMO
Consumer Defensive
QQQM
XMMO
Healthcare
QQQM
XMMO
Industrials
QQQM
XMMO
Utilities
QQQM
XMMO
Basic Materials
QQQM
XMMO
Energy
QQQM
XMMO
Financial Services
QQQM
XMMO
Real Estate
QQQM
XMMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQM vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank
QQQM
XMMO
QQQM vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QQQM | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.20 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | 1.73 | +0.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.64 | 6.99 | +0.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QQQM vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQM drawdown since its inception was -35.04%, smaller than the maximum XMMO drawdown of -55.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQM and XMMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQM | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.04% | -55.37% | +20.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.96% | -13.91% | +1.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.70% | -24.93% | +2.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.04% | -27.91% | -7.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.76% | -8.39% | +4.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.14% | -9.42% | +1.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.77% | 3.43% | +0.34% |
Volatility
QQQM vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) is 7.41%, while Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a volatility of 7.82%. This indicates that QQQM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQM | XMMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.41% | 7.82% | -0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.21% | 18.63% | -2.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.42% | 21.60% | -2.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.81% | 21.90% | +0.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.36% | 22.45% | -0.09% |
QQQM vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XMMO's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQQM vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison
QQQM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than XMMO's 0.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.44% | 0.50% | 0.61% | 0.65% | 0.83% | 0.40% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMMO Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF | 0.61% | 0.78% | 0.34% | 0.80% | 1.43% | 0.41% | 0.61% | 0.60% | 0.19% | 0.21% | 0.22% | 0.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQM and XMMO have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XMMO has higher volatility (7.82%) compared to QQQM (7.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQM dropped -35.04% vs XMMO's -55.37%.
On 5-year performance, QQQM leads with 15.05% vs 13.92% for XMMO. On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QQQM has been the lower-risk option at 7.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QQQM has performed better with a 15.05% return vs 13.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XMMO.
XMMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.61%, compared with 0.44% for QQQM.
QQQM is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while XMMO is Momentum. QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while XMMO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QQQM and 0.35% for XMMO.
QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQQM and XMMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer