QQQM vs. SPMO
QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQM is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QQQM returned 18.07%/yr vs 24.29%/yr for SPMO. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QQQM charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SPMO.
Performance
QQQM vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQM achieves a 21.39% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 30.35% return.
QQQM
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 10.67%
- YTD
- 21.39%
- 6M
- 19.75%
- 1Y
- 41.98%
- 3Y*
- 28.89%
- 5Y*
- 18.07%
- 10Y*
- —
SPMO
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- 15.36%
- YTD
- 30.35%
- 6M
- 30.51%
- 1Y
- 46.00%
- 3Y*
- 43.04%
- 5Y*
- 24.29%
- 10Y*
- 20.95%
QQQM vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 21.39% | 20.85% | 25.68% | 55.01% | -32.52% | 27.45% | 6.67% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 30.35% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 22.64% | 1.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQM and SPMO is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020 | 0.82 |
The correlation between QQQM and SPMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
QQQM vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QQQM
SPMO
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
Technology
QQQM
SPMO
Communication Services
QQQM
SPMO
Consumer Cyclical
QQQM
SPMO
Consumer Defensive
QQQM
SPMO
Healthcare
QQQM
SPMO
Industrials
QQQM
SPMO
Utilities
QQQM
SPMO
Basic Materials
QQQM
SPMO
Energy
QQQM
SPMO
Financial Services
QQQM
SPMO
Real Estate
QQQM
SPMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQM vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
QQQM
SPMO
QQQM vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQQM | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.47 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.53 | 3.64 | -0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.52 | 14.17 | -0.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQQM | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.65 | 2.62 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | 1.27 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 1.01 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
QQQM vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQM drawdown since its inception was -35.04%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQM and SPMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQM | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.04% | -30.95% | -4.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.96% | -12.70% | +0.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.70% | -20.13% | -2.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.04% | -22.74% | -12.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.20% | 0.00% | -0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.25% | -4.60% | -3.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.11% | 3.26% | -0.15% |
Volatility
QQQM vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) is 4.48%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 7.35%. This indicates that QQQM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQM | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.48% | 7.35% | -2.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.05% | 14.39% | -2.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.91% | 17.64% | -1.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.24% | 19.30% | +2.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.12% | 20.31% | +1.81% |
QQQM vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QQQM vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
QQQM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than SPMO's 0.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.41% | 0.50% | 0.61% | 0.65% | 0.83% | 0.40% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.65% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQM and SPMO have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPMO has higher volatility (7.35%) compared to QQQM (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQM dropped -35.04% vs SPMO's -30.95%.
On 5-year performance, SPMO leads with 24.29% vs 18.07% for QQQM. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, QQQM has been the lower-risk option at 4.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 24.29% return vs 18.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for QQQM.
SPMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.65%, compared with 0.41% for QQQM.
QQQM is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SPMO is Momentum. QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QQQM and 0.13% for SPMO.
QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 2.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQQM and SPMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer