PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQM vs. SPMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQM vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQM achieves a 17.07% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 26.49% return.


QQQM

1D
-0.90%
1M
-0.73%
6M
18.73%
YTD
17.07%
1Y
28.72%
3Y*
25.27%
5Y*
15.05%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
17.31%

SPMO

1D
-0.60%
1M
-1.77%
6M
28.96%
YTD
26.49%
1Y
32.07%
3Y*
39.71%
5Y*
20.97%
10Y*
20.10%
ALL TIME*
19.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.17B$981.56M$1.20B
$342.72M$341.89M$352.43M

QQQM vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
17.07%20.85%25.68%55.01%-32.52%27.45%6.64%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
26.49%26.58%45.82%17.56%-10.45%22.64%1.27%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQM and SPMO is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2020

0.82

The correlation between QQQM and SPMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

QQQM vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QQQM
SPMO

Technology

60.9%
53.7%

Communication Services

13.1%
7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
1.2%

Consumer Defensive

6.3%
4.2%

Healthcare

3.6%
6.9%

Industrials

2.7%
11.2%

Utilities

1.1%
2.7%

Basic Materials

1.0%
1.9%

Energy

0.5%
3.3%

Financial Services

0.2%
6.0%

Real Estate

0.1%
1.1%

Technology

QQQM
60.9%
SPMO
53.7%

Communication Services

QQQM
13.1%
SPMO
7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

QQQM
10.7%
SPMO
1.2%

Consumer Defensive

QQQM
6.3%
SPMO
4.2%

Healthcare

QQQM
3.6%
SPMO
6.9%

Industrials

QQQM
2.7%
SPMO
11.2%

Utilities

QQQM
1.1%
SPMO
2.7%

Basic Materials

QQQM
1.0%
SPMO
1.9%

Energy

QQQM
0.5%
SPMO
3.3%

Financial Services

QQQM
0.2%
SPMO
6.0%

Real Estate

QQQM
0.1%
SPMO
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQM vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QQQM
QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

SPMO
SPMO Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
SPMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPMO Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
SPMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPMO Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QQQM vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QQQMSPMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.25

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.41

2.06

+0.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.64

7.35

+0.29

QQQM vs. SPMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQM Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the SPMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQM and SPMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQQM vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQM drawdown since its inception was -35.04%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQM and SPMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQMSPMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.04%

-30.95%

-4.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.96%

-15.64%

+3.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.70%

-20.13%

-2.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.04%

-22.74%

-12.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.76%

-7.05%

+3.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.14%

-4.62%

-3.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.77%

4.37%

-0.60%

Volatility

QQQM vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) is 7.41%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 10.70%. This indicates that QQQM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQMSPMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.41%

10.70%

-3.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.21%

21.85%

-5.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.42%

24.09%

-4.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.81%

20.69%

+2.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.36%

20.97%

+1.39%

QQQM vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QQQM vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison

QQQM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than SPMO's 0.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
0.44%0.50%0.61%0.65%0.83%0.40%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPMO
Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
0.70%0.73%0.48%1.63%1.66%0.52%1.27%1.39%1.05%0.77%1.94%0.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQM and SPMO have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SPMO has higher volatility (10.70%) compared to QQQM (7.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQM dropped -35.04% vs SPMO's -30.95%.

On 5-year performance, SPMO leads with 20.97% vs 15.05% for QQQM. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, QQQM has been the lower-risk option at 7.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 20.97% return vs 15.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for QQQM.

SPMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.70%, compared with 0.44% for QQQM.

QQQM is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SPMO is Momentum. QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QQQM and 0.13% for SPMO.

QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQM and SPMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer