QQQM vs. SPLV

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) and SPLV (Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQM is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while SPLV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Low Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QQQM returned 16.11%/yr vs 6.37%/yr for SPLV. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QQQM charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for SPLV.

Performance

QQQM vs. SPLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) and Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQM achieves a 16.48% return, which is significantly higher than SPLV's 5.06% return.

QQQM

• 1D: -3.30%
• 1M: -0.42%
• YTD: 16.48%
• 6M: 15.00%
• 1Y: 34.99%
• 3Y*: 26.15%
• 5Y*: 16.11%
• 10Y*: —

SPLV

• 1D: 1.32%
• 1M: 0.35%
• YTD: 5.06%
• 6M: 4.84%
• 1Y: 4.45%
• 3Y*: 8.50%
• 5Y*: 6.37%
• 10Y*: 8.38%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQM vs. SPLV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	16.48%	20.85%	25.68%	55.01%	-32.52%	27.45%	6.64%
SPLV Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF	5.06%	4.10%	13.93%	0.53%	-4.88%	24.13%	1.19%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQM and SPLV is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.11
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.15
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2020	0.35

The correlation between QQQM and SPLV shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.35 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

QQQM vs. SPLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQM

QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 60
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 59
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 62

SPLV

SPLV Risk / Return Rank: 15
SPLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
SPLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
SPLV Omega Ratio Rank: 13
SPLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
SPLV Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQM vs. SPLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) and Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QQQM	SPLV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.97	0.44	+1.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.58	0.68	+1.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.08	+0.27
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.94	0.60	+2.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.88	1.39	+9.49

QQQM vs. SPLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQM Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is higher than the SPLV Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQM and SPLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QQQM vs. SPLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQM drawdown since its inception was -35.04%, roughly equal to the maximum SPLV drawdown of -36.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQM and SPLV.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQQM	SPLV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.04%	-36.26%	+1.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.96%	-7.41%	-4.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.70%	-9.64%	-13.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.04%	-17.26%	-17.78%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.26%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.24%	-3.47%	-0.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.20%	-3.55%	-4.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.22%	3.20%	+0.02%

Volatility

QQQM vs. SPLV - Volatility Comparison

Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) has a higher volatility of 9.00% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF (SPLV) at 4.26%. This indicates that QQQM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQQM	SPLV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.00%	4.26%	+4.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.43%	7.38%	+7.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.85%	10.28%	+7.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.53%	12.50%	+10.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.30%	15.39%	+6.91%

QQQM vs. SPLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SPLV's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

QQQM vs. SPLV - Dividend Comparison

QQQM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than SPLV's 2.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	0.44%	0.50%	0.61%	0.65%	0.83%	0.40%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SPLV Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF	2.16%	2.04%	1.88%	2.45%	2.11%	1.51%	2.12%	2.08%	2.18%	2.03%	2.03%	2.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQQM and SPLV in my portfolio?

QQQM and SPLV have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QQQM or SPLV?

QQQM has higher volatility (9.00%) compared to SPLV (4.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQM dropped -35.04% vs SPLV's -36.26%.

Which ETF is better, QQQM or SPLV?

On 5-year performance, QQQM leads with 16.11% vs 6.37% for SPLV. On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SPLV has been the lower-risk option at 4.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QQQM or SPLV?

Over the 5-year period, QQQM has performed better with a 16.11% return vs 6.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQQM or SPLV?

QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for SPLV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQQM or SPLV?

SPLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.16%, compared with 0.44% for QQQM.

What is the main difference between QQQM and SPLV?

QQQM is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SPLV is S&P 500. QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while SPLV tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QQQM and 0.25% for SPLV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.