QQQM vs. QQQG

Last updated Aug 6, 2026

QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) and QQQG (Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. QQQM is passively managed, while QQQG is actively managed. Over the past year, QQQM returned 28.72% vs 34.56% for QQQG. Their correlation of 0.91 means they have usually moved in the same direction. QQQM charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for QQQG.

Performance

QQQM vs. QQQG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) and Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQM achieves a 17.07% return, which is significantly lower than QQQG's 28.97% return.

QQQM

• 1D: -0.90%
• 1M: -0.73%
• 6M: 18.73%
• YTD: 17.07%
• 1Y: 28.72%
• 3Y*: 25.27%
• 5Y*: 15.05%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 17.31%

QQQG

• 1D: 3.68%
• 1M: 0.46%
• 6M: 32.20%
• YTD: 28.97%
• 1Y: 34.56%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 23.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
QQQG Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF	$354.95K	$397.77K	$489.74K
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	$1.17B	$981.56M	$1.20B

QQQM vs. QQQG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	17.07%	20.85%	6.57%
QQQG Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF	28.97%	14.72%	1.68%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQM and QQQG is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2024	0.91

The correlation between QQQM and QQQG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

QQQM vs. QQQG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QQQM	QQQG
Technology	60.9%	76.3%
Communication Services	13.1%	4.4%
Consumer Cyclical	10.7%	3.6%
Consumer Defensive	6.3%	2.1%
Healthcare	3.6%	9.7%
Industrials	2.7%	2.0%
Utilities	1.1%	-
Basic Materials	1.0%	-
Energy	0.5%	2.0%
Financial Services	0.2%	-
Real Estate	0.1%	-

Return for Risk

QQQM vs. QQQG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QQQM

QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 54
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 50
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 57

QQQG

QQQG Risk / Return Rank: 53
QQQG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
QQQG Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
QQQG Omega Ratio Rank: 48
QQQG Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
QQQG Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QQQM vs. QQQG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) and Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QQQM	QQQG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.49	1.41	+0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.06	1.96	+0.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.25	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.41	2.52	-0.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.64	7.47	+0.17

QQQM vs. QQQG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQM Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the QQQG Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQM and QQQG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QQQM vs. QQQG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQM drawdown since its inception was -35.04%, which is greater than QQQG's maximum drawdown of -23.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQM and QQQG.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQQM	QQQG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.04%	-23.61%	-11.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.96%	-13.79%	+1.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.70%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.04%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.76%	-5.78%	+2.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.14%	-3.76%	-4.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.77%	4.64%	-0.87%

Volatility

QQQM vs. QQQG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) is 7.41%, while Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) has a volatility of 9.43%. This indicates that QQQM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQQM	QQQG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.41%	9.43%	-2.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.21%	21.40%	-5.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.42%	24.67%	-5.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.81%	25.10%	-2.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.36%	25.10%	-2.74%

QQQM vs. QQQG - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQG's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQQM vs. QQQG - Dividend Comparison

QQQM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, more than QQQG's 0.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
QQQG Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF	0.05%	0.06%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	0.44%	0.50%	0.61%	0.65%	0.83%	0.40%	0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQQM and QQQG in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, QQQM and QQQG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, QQQM or QQQG?

QQQG has higher volatility (9.43%) compared to QQQM (7.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQM dropped -35.04% vs QQQG's -23.61%.

Which ETF is better, QQQM or QQQG?

On 1-year performance, QQQG leads with 34.56% vs 28.72% for QQQM. On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QQQM has been the lower-risk option at 7.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QQQM or QQQG?

Over the 1-year period, QQQG has performed better with a 34.56% return vs 28.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQQM or QQQG?

QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for QQQG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQQM or QQQG?

QQQM has the higher dividend yield at 0.44%, compared with 0.05% for QQQG.

What is the main difference between QQQM and QQQG?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QQQM and 0.49% for QQQG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.