QQQM vs. OILK
QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) and OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQM is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QQQM returned 18.07%/yr vs 17.73%/yr for OILK. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QQQM charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for OILK.
Performance
QQQM vs. OILK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQM achieves a 21.39% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 64.22% return.
QQQM
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 10.67%
- YTD
- 21.39%
- 6M
- 19.75%
- 1Y
- 41.98%
- 3Y*
- 28.89%
- 5Y*
- 18.07%
- 10Y*
- —
OILK
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 64.22%
- 6M
- 60.70%
- 1Y
- 58.99%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- 17.73%
- 10Y*
- —
QQQM vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 21.39% | 20.85% | 25.68% | 55.01% | -32.52% | 27.45% | 6.67% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 64.22% | -11.86% | 8.18% | -0.97% | 27.57% | 63.71% | 17.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQM and OILK is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020 | 0.05 |
The correlation between QQQM and OILK shifts across timeframes, from -0.26 (1 year) to 0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
QQQM vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QQQM
OILK
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
QQQM
OILK
-
Communication Services
QQQM
OILK
-
Consumer Cyclical
QQQM
OILK
Consumer Defensive
QQQM
OILK
-
Healthcare
QQQM
OILK
-
Industrials
QQQM
OILK
-
Utilities
QQQM
OILK
-
Basic Materials
QQQM
OILK
-
Energy
QQQM
OILK
-
Financial Services
QQQM
OILK
-
Real Estate
QQQM
OILK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQM vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank
QQQM
OILK
QQQM vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQQM | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.34 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.53 | 3.42 | +0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.52 | 6.91 | +6.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQQM | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.65 | 2.06 | +0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | 0.59 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 0.12 | +0.73 |
Drawdowns
QQQM vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQM drawdown since its inception was -35.04%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQM and OILK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQM | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.04% | -83.76% | +48.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.96% | -17.35% | +5.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.70% | -23.42% | +0.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.04% | -34.69% | -0.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.20% | -3.66% | +3.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.25% | -32.61% | +24.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.11% | 8.56% | -5.45% |
Volatility
QQQM vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) is 4.48%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 10.44%. This indicates that QQQM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQM | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.48% | 10.44% | -5.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.05% | 23.26% | -11.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.91% | 28.75% | -12.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.24% | 30.12% | -7.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.12% | 35.97% | -13.85% |
QQQM vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQQM vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison
QQQM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than OILK's 8.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 8.18% | 4.79% | 3.11% | 5.80% | 17.32% | 68.82% | 0.13% | 0.94% | 0.58% | 6.17% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.41% | 0.50% | 0.61% | 0.65% | 0.83% | 0.40% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQM and OILK have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OILK has higher volatility (10.44%) compared to QQQM (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQM dropped -35.04% vs OILK's -83.76%.
On 5-year performance, QQQM leads with 18.07% vs 17.73% for OILK. On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QQQM has been the lower-risk option at 4.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QQQM has performed better with a 18.07% return vs 17.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for OILK.
OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 0.41% for QQQM.
QQQM is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while OILK is Oil & Gas. QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while OILK tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QQQM and 0.68% for OILK.
QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQQM and OILK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer