QQQM vs. MAGS

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) and MAGS (Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQM is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while MAGS is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. QQQM is passively managed, while MAGS is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, QQQM returned 26.52%/yr vs 31.29%/yr for MAGS. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QQQM charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for MAGS.

Performance

QQQM vs. MAGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQM achieves a 17.59% return, which is significantly higher than MAGS's -1.59% return.

QQQM

• 1D: 0.67%
• 1M: 0.97%
• YTD: 17.59%
• 6M: 17.91%
• 1Y: 35.90%
• 3Y*: 26.52%
• 5Y*: 16.94%
• 10Y*: —

MAGS

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -7.97%
• YTD: -1.59%
• 6M: -0.43%
• 1Y: 23.09%
• 3Y*: 31.29%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQM vs. MAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	17.59%	20.85%	25.68%	29.62%
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF	-1.59%	22.99%	63.97%	35.74%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQM and MAGS is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2023	0.89

The correlation between QQQM and MAGS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

QQQM vs. MAGS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QQQM	MAGS
Technology	53.8%	15.3%
Communication Services	15.8%	9.1%
Consumer Cyclical	12.3%	10.3%
Consumer Defensive	7.7%	-
Healthcare	4.2%	-
Industrials	2.8%	-
Utilities	1.4%	-
Basic Materials	1.1%	-
Energy	0.6%	-
Financial Services	0.2%	-
Real Estate	0.1%	-

Return for Risk

QQQM vs. MAGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQM

QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 72
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 73
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 70

MAGS

MAGS Risk / Return Rank: 33
MAGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
MAGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
MAGS Omega Ratio Rank: 34
MAGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
MAGS Martin Ratio Rank: 32

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQM vs. MAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QQQM	MAGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.11	1.14	+0.97
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.74	1.62	+1.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.20	+0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.02	1.25	+1.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.23	4.21	+7.02

QQQM vs. MAGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQM Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is higher than the MAGS Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQM and MAGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QQQM vs. MAGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQM drawdown since its inception was -35.04%, which is greater than MAGS's maximum drawdown of -29.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQM and MAGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQQM	MAGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.04%	-29.91%	-5.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.96%	-18.62%	+6.66%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.70%	-29.91%	+7.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.04%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.33%	-8.50%	+5.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.23%	-4.72%	-3.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.21%	5.50%	-2.29%

Volatility

QQQM vs. MAGS - Volatility Comparison

Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) has a higher volatility of 7.45% compared to Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) at 5.86%. This indicates that QQQM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQQM	MAGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.45%	5.86%	+1.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.71%	15.07%	-1.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.11%	20.30%	-3.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.40%	25.97%	-3.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.22%	25.97%	-3.75%

QQQM vs. MAGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than MAGS's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQQM vs. MAGS - Dividend Comparison

QQQM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than MAGS's 1.50% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF	1.50%	1.48%	0.81%	0.44%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	0.43%	0.50%	0.61%	0.65%	0.83%	0.40%	0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQQM and MAGS in my portfolio?

QQQM and MAGS have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QQQM or MAGS?

QQQM has higher volatility (7.45%) compared to MAGS (5.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQM dropped -35.04% vs MAGS's -29.91%.

Which ETF is better, QQQM or MAGS?

On 3-year performance, MAGS leads with 31.29% vs 26.52% for QQQM. On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, MAGS has been the lower-risk option at 5.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QQQM or MAGS?

Over the 3-year period, MAGS has performed better with a 31.29% return vs 26.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQQM or MAGS?

QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for MAGS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQQM or MAGS?

MAGS has the higher dividend yield at 1.50%, compared with 0.43% for QQQM.

What is the main difference between QQQM and MAGS?

QQQM is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while MAGS is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QQQM and 0.29% for MAGS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.