QQQM vs. IBIC
QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) and IBIC (iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQM is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while IBIC is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QQQM returned 34.99% vs 4.42% for IBIC. At a correlation of -0.06, they often move in opposite directions. QQQM charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IBIC.
Performance
QQQM vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQM achieves a 16.48% return, which is significantly higher than IBIC's 2.43% return.
QQQM
- 1D
- -3.30%
- 1M
- -0.42%
- YTD
- 16.48%
- 6M
- 15.00%
- 1Y
- 34.99%
- 3Y*
- 26.15%
- 5Y*
- 16.11%
- 10Y*
- —
IBIC
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- 2.43%
- 6M
- 2.57%
- 1Y
- 4.42%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQM vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 16.48% | 20.85% | 25.68% | 9.00% |
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 2.43% | 4.96% | 5.25% | 2.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQM and IBIC is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023 | -0.06 |
The correlation between QQQM and IBIC shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to -0.06 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQM vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank
QQQM
IBIC
QQQM vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QQQM | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 2.22 | -0.88 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.94 | 16.56 | -13.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.88 | 58.67 | -47.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QQQM vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQM drawdown since its inception was -35.04%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQM and IBIC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQM | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.04% | -0.90% | -34.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.96% | -0.27% | -11.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.70% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.04% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.24% | -0.08% | -4.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.20% | -0.10% | -8.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.22% | 0.08% | +3.14% |
Volatility
QQQM vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) has a higher volatility of 9.00% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.17%. This indicates that QQQM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQM | IBIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.00% | 0.17% | +8.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.43% | 0.67% | +13.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.85% | 0.89% | +16.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.53% | 1.56% | +20.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.30% | 1.56% | +20.74% |
QQQM vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QQQM vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison
QQQM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than IBIC's 3.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBIC iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF | 3.58% | 4.43% | 4.65% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | 0.44% | 0.50% | 0.61% | 0.65% | 0.83% | 0.40% | 0.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQM and IBIC have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQM has higher volatility (9.00%) compared to IBIC (0.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQM dropped -35.04% vs IBIC's -0.90%.
On 1-year performance, QQQM leads with 34.99% vs 4.42% for IBIC. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QQQM has performed better with a 34.99% return vs 4.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for QQQM.
IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 3.58%, compared with 0.44% for QQQM.
QQQM is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while IBIC tracks ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QQQM and 0.10% for IBIC.
IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.99 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQQM and IBIC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer