PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
QQQM vs. FFRHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

QQQM vs. FFRHX

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) and FFRHX (Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund) are both funds - QQQM is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while FFRHX is a Bank Loan fund actively managed by Fidelity. QQQM is passively managed, while FFRHX is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, QQQM returned 17.66%/yr vs 5.38%/yr for FFRHX. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QQQM charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.67%/yr for FFRHX.

Performance

QQQM vs. FFRHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) and Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQM achieves a 21.25% return, which is significantly higher than FFRHX's 1.71% return.

QQQM

1D
3.11%
1M
4.92%
YTD
21.25%
6M
22.16%
1Y
41.92%
3Y*
27.28%
5Y*
17.66%
10Y*
—

FFRHX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.11%
YTD
1.71%
6M
2.09%
1Y
6.01%
3Y*
7.24%
5Y*
5.38%
10Y*
4.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQM vs. FFRHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF		21.25%20.85%25.68%55.01%-32.52%27.45%6.64%
FFRHX
Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund		1.71%5.47%7.10%12.63%-1.55%5.01%3.45%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQM and FFRHX is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2020

0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF

Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund

Often compared with QQQM:
QQQM vs. QQQQQQM vs. SCHGQQQM vs. VOOQQQM vs. VGTQQQM vs. SCHDQQQM vs. JEPQQQQM vs. FTEC
Often compared with FFRHX:
FFRHX vs. PRFRXFFRHX vs. FAGIXFFRHX vs. SCHPFFRHX vs. FTBFXFFRHX vs. FADMXFFRHX vs. FFRIXFFRHX vs. FFRAX

Return for Risk

QQQM vs. FFRHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
QQQM
QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
FFRHX
FFRHX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
FFRHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFRHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFRHX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
FFRHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFRHX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQM vs. FFRHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) and Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

QQQMFFRHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.43
2.50

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.13
5.94

-2.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.87

-0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.52

4.97

-1.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.11

17.32

-4.20

QQQM vs. FFRHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQM Sharpe Ratio is 2.43, which is comparable to the FFRHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQM and FFRHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQQM vs. FFRHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQM drawdown since its inception was -35.04%, which is greater than FFRHX's maximum drawdown of -22.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQM and FFRHX.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

QQQMFFRHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.04%

-22.20%

-12.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.96%

-1.19%

-10.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.70%

-3.29%

-19.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.04%

-5.90%

-29.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-22.20%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

-0.44%

+0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.22%

-1.15%

-7.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.20%

0.34%

+2.86%

Volatility

QQQM vs. FFRHX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) has a higher volatility of 8.01% compared to Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund (FFRHX) at 0.65%. This indicates that QQQM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFRHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

QQQMFFRHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.01%

0.65%

+7.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.01%

1.64%

+12.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.35%

2.37%

+14.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.45%

2.88%

+19.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.25%

4.14%

+18.11%

QQQM vs. FFRHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than FFRHX's 0.67% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQQM vs. FFRHX - Dividend Comparison

QQQM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than FFRHX's 7.09% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFRHX
Fidelity Floating Rate High Income Fund		7.09%7.41%6.94%8.24%3.81%2.74%3.84%5.15%4.74%4.05%4.44%3.69%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF		0.41%0.50%0.61%0.65%0.83%0.40%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

QQQM and FFRHX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQM has higher volatility (8.01%) compared to FFRHX (0.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQM dropped -35.04% vs FFRHX's -22.20%.

FFRHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQM and FFRHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer