PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
QQQM vs. EINC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

QQQM vs. EINC

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) and EINC (VanEck Energy Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQM is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while EINC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QQQM returned 16.11%/yr vs 21.18%/yr for EINC. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QQQM charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for EINC.

Performance

QQQM vs. EINC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQM achieves a 16.48% return, which is significantly lower than EINC's 25.97% return.

QQQM

1D
-3.30%
1M
-0.42%
YTD
16.48%
6M
15.00%
1Y
34.99%
3Y*
26.15%
5Y*
16.11%
10Y*
—

EINC

1D
1.37%
1M
-4.50%
YTD
25.97%
6M
25.98%
1Y
29.82%
3Y*
30.36%
5Y*
21.18%
10Y*
12.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQM vs. EINC - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF		16.48%20.85%25.68%55.01%-32.52%27.45%6.64%
EINC
VanEck Energy Income ETF		25.97%7.11%42.79%15.55%19.18%38.05%16.75%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQM and EINC is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2020

0.26

The correlation between QQQM and EINC shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.27 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QQQM vs. EINC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
QQQM
EINC

Technology

58.7%

-

Communication Services

14.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

11.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

6.4%

-

Healthcare

3.7%

-

Industrials

2.6%
2.5%

Utilities

1.2%
0.6%

Basic Materials

1.0%

-

Energy

0.5%
99.4%

Financial Services

0.2%

-

Real Estate

0.1%

-

Technology

QQQM
58.7%
EINC

-

Communication Services

QQQM
14.3%
EINC

-

Consumer Cyclical

QQQM
11.4%
EINC

-

Consumer Defensive

QQQM
6.4%
EINC

-

Healthcare

QQQM
3.7%
EINC

-

Industrials

QQQM
2.6%
EINC
2.5%

Utilities

QQQM
1.2%
EINC
0.6%

Basic Materials

QQQM
1.0%
EINC

-

Energy

QQQM
0.5%
EINC
99.4%

Financial Services

QQQM
0.2%
EINC

-

Real Estate

QQQM
0.1%
EINC

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF

VanEck Energy Income ETF

Often compared with QQQM:
QQQM vs. QQQQQQM vs. SCHGQQQM vs. VOOQQQM vs. VGTQQQM vs. SCHDQQQM vs. FTECQQQM vs. JEPQ
Often compared with EINC:
EINC vs. XLEEINC vs. BIZDEINC vs. EMLPEINC vs. SMHEINC vs. IXCEINC vs. VPUEINC vs. ERY

Return for Risk

QQQM vs. EINC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
QQQM
QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
EINC
EINC Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
EINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
EINC Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
EINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
EINC Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQM vs. EINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

QQQMEINCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.97
1.99

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.58
2.67

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.35

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.94

3.80

-0.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.88

9.63

+1.25

QQQM vs. EINC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQM Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the EINC Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQM and EINC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQQM vs. EINC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQM drawdown since its inception was -35.04%, smaller than the maximum EINC drawdown of -87.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQM and EINC.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

QQQMEINCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.04%

-87.55%

+52.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.96%

-7.89%

-4.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.70%

-16.01%

-6.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.04%

-19.87%

-15.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-68.85%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.24%

-4.50%

+0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.20%

-44.15%

+35.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.22%

3.10%

+0.12%

Volatility

QQQM vs. EINC - Volatility Comparison

Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) has a higher volatility of 9.00% compared to VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) at 6.51%. This indicates that QQQM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EINC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

QQQMEINCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.00%

6.51%

+2.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.43%

11.88%

+2.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.85%

15.10%

+2.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.53%

19.54%

+2.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.30%

25.43%

-3.13%

QQQM vs. EINC - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQM has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than EINC's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQQM vs. EINC - Dividend Comparison

QQQM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than EINC's 3.51% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EINC
VanEck Energy Income ETF		3.51%4.51%3.33%3.77%2.89%6.03%6.69%9.66%11.31%8.53%9.71%28.53%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF		0.44%0.50%0.61%0.65%0.83%0.40%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

QQQM and EINC have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQM has higher volatility (9.00%) compared to EINC (6.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQM dropped -35.04% vs EINC's -87.55%.

On 5-year performance, EINC leads with 21.18% vs 16.11% for QQQM. On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, EINC has been the lower-risk option at 6.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EINC has performed better with a 21.18% return vs 16.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for EINC.

EINC has the higher dividend yield at 3.51%, compared with 0.44% for QQQM.

QQQM is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while EINC is Energy Equities. QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while EINC tracks MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QQQM and 0.45% for EINC.

EINC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQM and EINC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer