QQQJ vs. SPMO
QQQJ (Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQJ is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ Next Generation 100 Index, while SPMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QQQJ returned 7.79%/yr vs 23.92%/yr for SPMO. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QQQJ charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for SPMO.
Performance
QQQJ vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQJ achieves a 23.83% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 28.45% return.
QQQJ
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 10.77%
- YTD
- 23.83%
- 6M
- 23.61%
- 1Y
- 47.01%
- 3Y*
- 22.59%
- 5Y*
- 7.79%
- 10Y*
- —
SPMO
- 1D
- -1.46%
- 1M
- 10.84%
- YTD
- 28.45%
- 6M
- 27.50%
- 1Y
- 43.92%
- 3Y*
- 42.27%
- 5Y*
- 23.92%
- 10Y*
- 20.77%
QQQJ vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQJ Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF | 23.83% | 20.44% | 15.36% | 13.68% | -28.25% | 9.76% | 15.25% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 28.45% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 22.64% | 1.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQJ and SPMO is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020 | 0.73 |
The correlation between QQQJ and SPMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
QQQJ vs. SPMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QQQJ
SPMO
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Technology
QQQJ
SPMO
Healthcare
QQQJ
SPMO
Consumer Cyclical
QQQJ
SPMO
Industrials
QQQJ
SPMO
Communication Services
QQQJ
SPMO
Basic Materials
QQQJ
SPMO
Consumer Defensive
QQQJ
SPMO
Energy
QQQJ
SPMO
Utilities
QQQJ
SPMO
Financial Services
QQQJ
SPMO
Real Estate
QQQJ
-
SPMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQJ vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
QQQJ
SPMO
QQQJ vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQQJ | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.44 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.99 | 3.47 | +0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.19 | 13.52 | +3.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQQJ | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.62 | 2.49 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 1.25 | -0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 1.00 | -0.52 |
Drawdowns
QQQJ vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQJ drawdown since its inception was -39.57%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQJ and SPMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQJ | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.57% | -30.95% | -8.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.84% | -12.70% | +0.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.46% | -20.13% | -2.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.57% | -22.74% | -16.83% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.20% | -1.46% | +1.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.73% | -4.60% | -11.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.74% | 3.26% | -0.52% |
Volatility
QQQJ vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) is 5.59%, while Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) has a volatility of 7.39%. This indicates that QQQJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQJ | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.59% | 7.39% | -1.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.65% | 14.49% | +0.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.06% | 17.70% | +0.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.02% | 19.30% | +2.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.05% | 20.31% | +1.74% |
QQQJ vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQJ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QQQJ vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
QQQJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, more than SPMO's 0.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQJ Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF | 0.71% | 0.85% | 0.77% | 0.67% | 0.76% | 0.91% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.66% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQJ and SPMO have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPMO has higher volatility (7.39%) compared to QQQJ (5.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQJ dropped -39.57% vs SPMO's -30.95%.
On 5-year performance, SPMO leads with 23.92% vs 7.79% for QQQJ. On fees, SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, QQQJ has been the lower-risk option at 5.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPMO has performed better with a 23.92% return vs 7.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPMO is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for QQQJ.
QQQJ has the higher dividend yield at 0.71%, compared with 0.66% for SPMO.
QQQJ is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPMO is Momentum. QQQJ tracks NASDAQ Next Generation 100 Index, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QQQJ and 0.13% for SPMO.
QQQJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQQJ and SPMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer