PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQJ vs. SPHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQJ vs. SPHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQJ achieves a 23.23% return, which is significantly higher than SPHD's 4.38% return.


QQQJ

1D
-0.68%
1M
11.40%
YTD
23.23%
6M
23.58%
1Y
46.58%
3Y*
22.25%
5Y*
7.69%
10Y*

SPHD

1D
-0.89%
1M
-0.82%
YTD
4.38%
6M
4.63%
1Y
8.12%
3Y*
11.42%
5Y*
5.48%
10Y*
7.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQJ vs. SPHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
QQQJ
Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF
23.23%20.44%15.36%13.68%-28.25%9.76%15.25%
SPHD
Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
4.38%3.41%18.08%1.32%0.58%24.98%11.08%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQJ and SPHD is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020

0.44

The correlation between QQQJ and SPHD shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (1 year) to 0.48 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QQQJ vs. SPHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QQQJ
SPHD

Technology

39.3%
1.5%

Healthcare

18.3%
5.1%

Consumer Cyclical

11.4%
3.4%

Industrials

11.2%
0.0%

Communication Services

6.8%
8.6%

Basic Materials

2.7%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.6%
17.8%

Energy

2.6%
14.1%

Utilities

2.6%
13.7%

Financial Services

1.0%
15.6%

Real Estate

-

20.1%

Technology

QQQJ
39.3%
SPHD
1.5%

Healthcare

QQQJ
18.3%
SPHD
5.1%

Consumer Cyclical

QQQJ
11.4%
SPHD
3.4%

Industrials

QQQJ
11.2%
SPHD
0.0%

Communication Services

QQQJ
6.8%
SPHD
8.6%

Basic Materials

QQQJ
2.7%
SPHD

-

Consumer Defensive

QQQJ
2.6%
SPHD
17.8%

Energy

QQQJ
2.6%
SPHD
14.1%

Utilities

QQQJ
2.6%
SPHD
13.7%

Financial Services

QQQJ
1.0%
SPHD
15.6%

Real Estate

QQQJ

-

SPHD
20.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQJ vs. SPHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQJ
QQQJ Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
QQQJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQJ Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQJ Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

SPHD
SPHD Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
SPHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPHD Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
SPHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPHD Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQJ vs. SPHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQJSPHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.13

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.95

1.11

+2.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.03

2.78

+14.25

QQQJ vs. SPHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is higher than the SPHD Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQJ and SPHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQJSPHDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.59

0.74

+1.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.39

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.58

-0.10

Drawdowns

QQQJ vs. SPHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQJ drawdown since its inception was -39.57%, roughly equal to the maximum SPHD drawdown of -41.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQJ and SPHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQJSPHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.57%

-41.39%

+1.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.84%

-7.33%

-4.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.46%

-13.29%

-9.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.57%

-19.50%

-20.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.68%

-5.37%

+4.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.74%

-4.70%

-11.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.74%

2.93%

-0.19%

Volatility

QQQJ vs. SPHD - Volatility Comparison

Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) has a higher volatility of 5.62% compared to Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD) at 2.99%. This indicates that QQQJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQJSPHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.62%

2.99%

+2.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.65%

7.55%

+7.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.09%

11.04%

+7.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.02%

14.16%

+7.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.06%

17.64%

+4.42%

QQQJ vs. SPHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQJ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SPHD's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQQJ vs. SPHD - Dividend Comparison

QQQJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, less than SPHD's 4.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQJ
Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF
0.71%0.85%0.77%0.67%0.76%0.91%0.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPHD
Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF
4.62%4.02%3.41%4.48%3.89%3.45%4.89%4.07%4.40%3.14%3.83%3.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQJ and SPHD have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQJ has higher volatility (5.62%) compared to SPHD (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQJ dropped -39.57% vs SPHD's -41.39%.

On 5-year performance, QQQJ leads with 7.69% vs 5.48% for SPHD. On fees, QQQJ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SPHD has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QQQJ has performed better with a 7.69% return vs 5.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQJ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for SPHD.

SPHD has the higher dividend yield at 4.62%, compared with 0.71% for QQQJ.

QQQJ is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPHD is Dividend. QQQJ tracks NASDAQ Next Generation 100 Index, while SPHD tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QQQJ and 0.30% for SPHD.

QQQJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.59 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQJ and SPHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer