QQQJ vs. RNPGX

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

QQQJ (Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF) and RNPGX (American Funds New Perspective Fund Class R-6) are both funds - QQQJ is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ Next Generation 100 Index, while RNPGX is a Global Equities fund managed by American Funds. Over the past 5 years, QQQJ returned 6.73%/yr vs 8.43%/yr for RNPGX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QQQJ charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for RNPGX.

Performance

QQQJ vs. RNPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) and American Funds New Perspective Fund Class R-6 (RNPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQJ achieves a 21.16% return, which is significantly higher than RNPGX's 6.92% return.

QQQJ

• 1D: -1.07%
• 1M: 0.90%
• 6M: 14.19%
• YTD: 21.16%
• 1Y: 38.78%
• 3Y*: 19.75%
• 5Y*: 6.73%
• 10Y*: —

RNPGX

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 1.79%
• 6M: 3.49%
• YTD: 6.92%
• 1Y: 15.42%
• 3Y*: 17.66%
• 5Y*: 8.43%
• 10Y*: 13.70%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQJ vs. RNPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
QQQJ Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF	21.16%	20.44%	15.36%	13.68%	-28.25%	9.76%	15.34%
RNPGX American Funds New Perspective Fund Class R-6	6.92%	21.71%	17.13%	25.06%	-25.70%	18.00%	11.60%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQJ and RNPGX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2020	0.87

The correlation between QQQJ and RNPGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

QQQJ vs. RNPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQJ

QQQJ Risk / Return Rank: 80
QQQJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
QQQJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
QQQJ Omega Ratio Rank: 76
QQQJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
QQQJ Martin Ratio Rank: 85

RNPGX

RNPGX Risk / Return Rank: 24
RNPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
RNPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
RNPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 24
RNPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
RNPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQJ vs. RNPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) and American Funds New Perspective Fund Class R-6 (RNPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QQQJ	RNPGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.04	1.02	+1.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.77	1.50	+1.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.19	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.29	1.29	+2.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.55	5.32	+8.23

QQQJ vs. RNPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is higher than the RNPGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQJ and RNPGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QQQJ vs. RNPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQJ drawdown since its inception was -39.57%, which is greater than RNPGX's maximum drawdown of -34.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQJ and RNPGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQQJ	RNPGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.57%	-34.25%	-5.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.84%	-11.44%	-0.40%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.46%	-17.90%	-4.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.57%	-34.25%	-5.32%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.25%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.35%	-0.64%	-1.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.49%	-5.53%	-9.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.87%	2.77%	+0.10%

Volatility

QQQJ vs. RNPGX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) and American Funds New Perspective Fund Class R-6 (RNPGX) have volatilities of 5.19% and 5.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQQJ	RNPGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.19%	5.33%	-0.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.53%	12.18%	+3.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.11%	14.46%	+4.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.19%	17.39%	+4.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.05%	17.77%	+4.28%

QQQJ vs. RNPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQJ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than RNPGX's 0.42% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQQJ vs. RNPGX - Dividend Comparison

QQQJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than RNPGX's 6.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QQQJ Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF	0.55%	0.85%	0.77%	0.67%	0.76%	0.91%	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RNPGX American Funds New Perspective Fund Class R-6	6.43%	6.87%	5.45%	5.67%	4.53%	7.31%	4.41%	4.47%	7.95%	5.80%	4.20%	6.46%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQQJ and RNPGX in my portfolio?

QQQJ and RNPGX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QQQJ or RNPGX?

RNPGX has higher volatility (5.33%) compared to QQQJ (5.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQJ dropped -39.57% vs RNPGX's -34.25%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.