PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQJ vs. NACP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQJ vs. NACP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) and Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with QQQJ having a 23.23% return and NACP slightly lower at 22.18%.


QQQJ

1D
-0.68%
1M
11.40%
YTD
23.23%
6M
23.58%
1Y
46.58%
3Y*
22.25%
5Y*
7.69%
10Y*

NACP

1D
-0.13%
1M
9.92%
YTD
22.18%
6M
20.98%
1Y
43.81%
3Y*
27.18%
5Y*
15.98%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQJ vs. NACP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
QQQJ
Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF
23.23%20.44%15.36%13.68%-28.25%9.76%15.25%
NACP
Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF
22.18%21.38%23.93%29.69%-23.05%27.62%7.79%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQJ and NACP is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020

0.83

The correlation between QQQJ and NACP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

QQQJ vs. NACP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QQQJ
NACP

Technology

39.3%
35.8%

Healthcare

18.3%
9.2%

Consumer Cyclical

11.4%
11.1%

Industrials

11.2%
8.7%

Communication Services

6.8%
9.8%

Basic Materials

2.7%
1.5%

Consumer Defensive

2.6%
3.6%

Energy

2.6%
5.0%

Utilities

2.6%
3.4%

Financial Services

1.0%
10.6%

Real Estate

-

1.3%

Technology

QQQJ
39.3%
NACP
35.8%

Healthcare

QQQJ
18.3%
NACP
9.2%

Consumer Cyclical

QQQJ
11.4%
NACP
11.1%

Industrials

QQQJ
11.2%
NACP
8.7%

Communication Services

QQQJ
6.8%
NACP
9.8%

Basic Materials

QQQJ
2.7%
NACP
1.5%

Consumer Defensive

QQQJ
2.6%
NACP
3.6%

Energy

QQQJ
2.6%
NACP
5.0%

Utilities

QQQJ
2.6%
NACP
3.4%

Financial Services

QQQJ
1.0%
NACP
10.6%

Real Estate

QQQJ

-

NACP
1.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQJ vs. NACP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQJ
QQQJ Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
QQQJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQJ Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQJ Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

NACP
NACP Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
NACP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NACP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
NACP Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
NACP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
NACP Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQJ vs. NACP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) and Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQJNACPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.54

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.95

4.56

-0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.03

20.04

-3.01

QQQJ vs. NACP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.59, which is comparable to the NACP Sharpe Ratio of 3.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQJ and NACP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQJNACPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.59

3.14

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.92

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.93

-0.45

Drawdowns

QQQJ vs. NACP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQJ drawdown since its inception was -39.57%, which is greater than NACP's maximum drawdown of -30.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQJ and NACP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQJNACPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.57%

-30.96%

-8.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.84%

-9.65%

-2.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.46%

-19.66%

-2.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.57%

-27.89%

-11.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.68%

-0.13%

-0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.74%

-5.75%

-9.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.74%

2.19%

+0.55%

Volatility

QQQJ vs. NACP - Volatility Comparison

Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) has a higher volatility of 5.62% compared to Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF (NACP) at 4.44%. This indicates that QQQJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NACP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQJNACPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.62%

4.44%

+1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.65%

11.13%

+3.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.09%

14.02%

+4.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.02%

17.47%

+4.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.06%

18.70%

+3.36%

QQQJ vs. NACP - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQJ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than NACP's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQQJ vs. NACP - Dividend Comparison

QQQJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.71%, more than NACP's 0.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
NACP
Impact Shares NAACP Minority Empowerment ETF
0.55%0.62%2.96%1.28%3.48%3.06%1.48%1.22%0.71%
QQQJ
Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF
0.71%0.85%0.77%0.67%0.76%0.91%0.09%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQJ and NACP have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQJ has higher volatility (5.62%) compared to NACP (4.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQJ dropped -39.57% vs NACP's -30.96%.

On 5-year performance, NACP leads with 15.98% vs 7.69% for QQQJ. On fees, QQQJ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, NACP has been the lower-risk option at 4.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, NACP has performed better with a 15.98% return vs 7.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQJ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for NACP.

QQQJ has the higher dividend yield at 0.71%, compared with 0.55% for NACP.

QQQJ tracks NASDAQ Next Generation 100 Index, while NACP tracks Morningstar Minority Empowerment Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Impact Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QQQJ and 0.49% for NACP.

NACP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs 2.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQJ and NACP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer