QQQJ vs. IDMO
QQQJ (Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF) and IDMO (Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQJ is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ Next Generation 100 Index, while IDMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QQQJ returned 6.66%/yr vs 16.54%/yr for IDMO. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QQQJ charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IDMO.
Performance
QQQJ vs. IDMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQJ achieves a 21.43% return, which is significantly higher than IDMO's 12.70% return.
QQQJ
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 3.40%
- YTD
- 21.43%
- 6M
- 18.32%
- 1Y
- 44.44%
- 3Y*
- 21.75%
- 5Y*
- 6.66%
- 10Y*
- —
IDMO
- 1D
- 1.34%
- 1M
- 4.29%
- YTD
- 12.70%
- 6M
- 12.58%
- 1Y
- 30.52%
- 3Y*
- 27.60%
- 5Y*
- 16.54%
- 10Y*
- 13.82%
QQQJ vs. IDMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQJ Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF | 21.43% | 20.44% | 15.36% | 13.68% | -28.25% | 9.76% | 15.34% |
IDMO Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF | 12.70% | 42.17% | 12.79% | 20.16% | -12.03% | 14.31% | 7.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQJ and IDMO is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2020 | 0.67 |
The correlation between QQQJ and IDMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
QQQJ vs. IDMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QQQJ
IDMO
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Financial Services
Energy
Real Estate
-
Technology
QQQJ
IDMO
Healthcare
QQQJ
IDMO
Consumer Cyclical
QQQJ
IDMO
Industrials
QQQJ
IDMO
Communication Services
QQQJ
IDMO
Basic Materials
QQQJ
IDMO
Consumer Defensive
QQQJ
IDMO
Utilities
QQQJ
IDMO
Financial Services
QQQJ
IDMO
Energy
QQQJ
IDMO
Real Estate
QQQJ
-
IDMO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQJ vs. IDMO — Risk / Return Rank
QQQJ
IDMO
QQQJ vs. IDMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QQQJ | IDMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.32 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.77 | 2.49 | +1.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.67 | 10.10 | +5.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QQQJ vs. IDMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQJ drawdown since its inception was -39.57%, roughly equal to the maximum IDMO drawdown of -39.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQJ and IDMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQJ | IDMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.57% | -39.38% | -0.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.84% | -12.31% | +0.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.46% | -12.65% | -9.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.57% | -27.07% | -12.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.13% | 0.00% | -2.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.63% | -9.73% | -5.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.84% | 3.03% | -0.19% |
Volatility
QQQJ vs. IDMO - Volatility Comparison
Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) have volatilities of 7.13% and 7.29%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQJ | IDMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.13% | 7.29% | -0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.65% | 16.13% | -0.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.99% | 17.95% | +1.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.17% | 18.06% | +4.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.11% | 18.19% | +3.92% |
QQQJ vs. IDMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQJ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than IDMO's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QQQJ vs. IDMO - Dividend Comparison
QQQJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, less than IDMO's 4.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDMO Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF | 3.55% | 3.71% | 2.24% | 2.89% | 3.66% | 1.81% | 1.63% | 2.78% | 3.27% | 3.08% | 2.18% | 2.52% |
QQQJ Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF | 0.55% | 0.85% | 0.77% | 0.67% | 0.76% | 0.91% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQJ and IDMO have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IDMO has higher volatility (7.29%) compared to QQQJ (7.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQJ dropped -39.57% vs IDMO's -39.38%.
On 5-year performance, IDMO leads with 16.54% vs 6.66% for QQQJ. On fees, QQQJ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QQQJ has been the lower-risk option at 7.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IDMO has performed better with a 16.54% return vs 6.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQJ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IDMO.
IDMO has the higher dividend yield at 4.24%, compared with 0.75% for QQQJ.
QQQJ is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while IDMO is Momentum. QQQJ tracks NASDAQ Next Generation 100 Index, while IDMO tracks S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QQQJ and 0.25% for IDMO.
QQQJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQQJ and IDMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer