QQQJ vs. CAOS
QQQJ (Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF) and CAOS (Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQJ is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ Next Generation 100 Index, while CAOS is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Alpha Architect. QQQJ is passively managed, while CAOS is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, QQQJ returned 19.03%/yr vs 3.48%/yr for CAOS. Their 0.04 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. QQQJ charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for CAOS.
Performance
QQQJ vs. CAOS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQJ achieves a 19.53% return, which is significantly higher than CAOS's 0.76% return.
QQQJ
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -3.19%
- 6M
- 15.30%
- YTD
- 19.53%
- 1Y
- 34.13%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- 6.23%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.75%
CAOS
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -0.01%
- 6M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- 0.76%
- 1Y
- 1.73%
- 3Y*
- 3.48%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.70%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $6.81M | $5.39M | $5.09M | |
| $4.82M | $6.21M | $6.07M |
QQQJ vs. CAOS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQJ Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF | 19.53% | 20.44% | 15.36% | 4.67% |
CAOS Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF | 0.76% | 2.55% | 5.33% | 7.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQJ and CAOS is -0.32, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2023 | 0.04 |
The correlation between QQQJ and CAOS shifts across timeframes, from -0.32 (1 year) to 0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQJ vs. CAOS — Risk / Return Rank
QQQJ
CAOS
QQQJ vs. CAOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) and Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QQQJ | CAOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.24 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.80 | 2.47 | +0.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.02 | 5.45 | +5.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QQQJ vs. CAOS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQJ drawdown since its inception was -39.57%, which is greater than CAOS's maximum drawdown of -3.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQJ and CAOS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQJ | CAOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.57% | -3.89% | -35.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.84% | -0.76% | -11.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.46% | -3.60% | -18.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.57% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.66% | -1.13% | -2.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.38% | -0.92% | -14.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.00% | 0.34% | +2.66% |
Volatility
QQQJ vs. CAOS - Volatility Comparison
Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF (QQQJ) has a higher volatility of 3.49% compared to Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF (CAOS) at 0.51%. This indicates that QQQJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CAOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQJ | CAOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.49% | 0.51% | +2.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.46% | 1.07% | +14.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.15% | 1.57% | +17.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.14% | 4.18% | +17.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.96% | 4.18% | +17.78% |
QQQJ vs. CAOS - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQJ has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CAOS's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQQJ vs. CAOS - Dividend Comparison
QQQJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, while CAOS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAOS Alpha Architect Tail Risk ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQJ Invesco NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF | 0.56% | 0.85% | 0.77% | 0.67% | 0.76% | 0.91% | 0.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQJ and CAOS have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQJ has higher volatility (3.49%) compared to CAOS (0.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQJ dropped -39.57% vs CAOS's -3.89%.
On 3-year performance, QQQJ leads with 19.03% vs 3.48% for CAOS. On fees, QQQJ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, CAOS has been the lower-risk option at 0.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, QQQJ has performed better with a 19.03% return vs 3.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQJ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for CAOS.
QQQJ has the higher dividend yield at 0.56%, compared with 0.00% for CAOS.
QQQJ is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while CAOS is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Alpha Architect. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QQQJ and 0.63% for CAOS.
QQQJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQQJ and CAOS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer