QQQI vs. XAIX

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) and XAIX (Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQI is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Neos, while XAIX is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Global Artificial Intelligence and Big Data Index. QQQI is actively managed, while XAIX is passively managed. Over the past year, QQQI returned 25.86% vs 54.71% for XAIX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QQQI charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XAIX.

Performance

QQQI vs. XAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) and Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF (XAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQI achieves a 9.93% return, which is significantly lower than XAIX's 30.20% return.

QQQI

• 1D: 1.27%
• 1M: -0.05%
• YTD: 9.93%
• 6M: 9.25%
• 1Y: 25.86%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XAIX

• 1D: 2.48%
• 1M: 5.11%
• YTD: 30.20%
• 6M: 30.19%
• 1Y: 54.71%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQI vs. XAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	9.93%	18.62%	14.83%
XAIX Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF	30.20%	29.05%	15.47%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQI and XAIX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2024	0.92

The correlation between QQQI and XAIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

QQQI vs. XAIX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QQQI	XAIX
Technology	53.3%	71.7%
Communication Services	15.7%	14.1%
Consumer Cyclical	12.1%	8.9%
Consumer Defensive	7.7%	0.0%
Healthcare	4.3%	0.0%
Industrials	3.3%	0.1%
Utilities	1.5%	0.0%
Basic Materials	1.2%	0.0%
Energy	0.7%	0.0%
Financial Services	0.3%	5.2%
Real Estate	0.1%	-

Return for Risk

QQQI vs. XAIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQI

QQQI Risk / Return Rank: 64
QQQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
QQQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
QQQI Omega Ratio Rank: 66
QQQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
QQQI Martin Ratio Rank: 71

XAIX

XAIX Risk / Return Rank: 80
XAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
XAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
XAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 80
XAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
XAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQI vs. XAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) and Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF (XAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QQQI	XAIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.91	2.45	-0.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.48	3.04	-0.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.43	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.70	3.92	-1.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.98	14.14	-2.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QQQI vs. XAIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQI Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the XAIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQI and XAIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QQQI	XAIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.91	2.45	-0.54
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.22	1.81	-0.59

Drawdowns

QQQI vs. XAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQI drawdown since its inception was -20.00%, smaller than the maximum XAIX drawdown of -23.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQI and XAIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQQI	XAIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.00%	-23.95%	+3.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.61%	-14.01%	+4.40%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.26%	-8.33%	+5.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.20%	-3.51%	+1.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.16%	3.88%	-1.72%

Volatility

QQQI vs. XAIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) is 5.07%, while Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF (XAIX) has a volatility of 12.81%. This indicates that QQQI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQQI	XAIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.07%	12.81%	-7.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.75%	19.45%	-8.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.65%	22.47%	-8.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.25%	24.10%	-6.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.25%	24.10%	-6.85%

QQQI vs. XAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than XAIX's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQQI vs. XAIX - Dividend Comparison

QQQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.61%, more than XAIX's 0.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	13.61%	13.82%	12.85%
XAIX Xtrackers Artificial Intelligence and Big Data ETF	0.41%	0.54%	0.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQQI and XAIX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, QQQI and XAIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, QQQI or XAIX?

XAIX has higher volatility (12.81%) compared to QQQI (5.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQI dropped -20.00% vs XAIX's -23.95%.

Which ETF is better, QQQI or XAIX?

On 1-year performance, XAIX leads with 54.71% vs 25.86% for QQQI. On fees, XAIX is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, QQQI has been the lower-risk option at 5.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QQQI or XAIX?

Over the 1-year period, XAIX has performed better with a 54.71% return vs 25.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQQI or XAIX?

XAIX is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for QQQI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQQI or XAIX?

QQQI has the higher dividend yield at 13.61%, compared with 0.41% for XAIX.

What is the main difference between QQQI and XAIX?

QQQI is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while XAIX is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Neos and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for QQQI and 0.35% for XAIX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.