QQQI vs. SVOL
QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) and SVOL (Simplify Volatility Premium ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQI is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Neos, while SVOL is a Volatility fund actively managed by Simplify. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, QQQI returned 27.00% vs 14.90% for SVOL. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QQQI charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SVOL.
Performance
QQQI vs. SVOL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQI achieves a 10.58% return, which is significantly higher than SVOL's -0.84% return.
QQQI
- 1D
- 0.70%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- YTD
- 10.58%
- 6M
- 11.20%
- 1Y
- 27.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SVOL
- 1D
- 1.14%
- 1M
- 1.70%
- YTD
- -0.84%
- 6M
- 0.96%
- 1Y
- 14.90%
- 3Y*
- 5.92%
- 5Y*
- 6.22%
- 10Y*
- —
QQQI vs. SVOL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 10.58% | 18.62% | 19.44% |
SVOL Simplify Volatility Premium ETF | -0.84% | 2.41% | 5.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQI and SVOL is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2024 | 0.75 |
The correlation between QQQI and SVOL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQI vs. SVOL — Risk / Return Rank
QQQI
SVOL
QQQI vs. SVOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) and Simplify Volatility Premium ETF (SVOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QQQI | SVOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.11 | +0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.70 | 0.80 | +1.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.63 | 1.90 | +9.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QQQI vs. SVOL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQI drawdown since its inception was -20.00%, smaller than the maximum SVOL drawdown of -33.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQI and SVOL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQI | SVOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.00% | -33.50% | +13.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.61% | -13.01% | +3.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -33.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.69% | -3.40% | +0.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.21% | -4.76% | +2.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.23% | 5.50% | -3.27% |
Volatility
QQQI vs. SVOL - Volatility Comparison
NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) has a higher volatility of 6.10% compared to Simplify Volatility Premium ETF (SVOL) at 3.48%. This indicates that QQQI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SVOL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQI | SVOL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.10% | 3.48% | +2.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.35% | 9.95% | +1.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.10% | 20.81% | -6.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.34% | 22.01% | -4.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.34% | 21.90% | -4.56% |
QQQI vs. SVOL - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than SVOL's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQQI vs. SVOL - Dividend Comparison
QQQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.53%, less than SVOL's 22.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 13.53% | 13.82% | 12.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SVOL Simplify Volatility Premium ETF | 22.19% | 19.82% | 16.79% | 16.36% | 18.32% | 4.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQI and SVOL have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQI has higher volatility (6.10%) compared to SVOL (3.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQI dropped -20.00% vs SVOL's -33.50%.
On 1-year performance, QQQI leads with 27.00% vs 14.90% for SVOL. On fees, SVOL is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SVOL has been the lower-risk option at 3.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QQQI has performed better with a 27.00% return vs 14.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SVOL is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for QQQI.
SVOL has the higher dividend yield at 22.19%, compared with 13.53% for QQQI.
QQQI is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SVOL is Volatility. They also come from different issuers: Neos and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for QQQI and 0.50% for SVOL.
QQQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQQI and SVOL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer