PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQI vs. NVO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQI vs. NVO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) and Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQI achieves a 13.07% return, which is significantly higher than NVO's -12.15% return.


QQQI

1D
1.98%
1M
1.96%
YTD
13.07%
6M
12.95%
1Y
29.61%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NVO

1D
-0.76%
1M
-3.94%
YTD
-12.15%
6M
-7.05%
1Y
-38.72%
3Y*
-16.67%
5Y*
3.13%
10Y*
7.50%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQI vs. NVO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
13.07%18.62%19.44%
NVO
Novo Nordisk A/S
-12.15%-39.22%-20.23%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQI and NVO is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2024

0.28

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQI vs. NVO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQI
QQQI Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
QQQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQI Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQI Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

NVO
NVO Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
NVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVO Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
NVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVO Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQI vs. NVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) and Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QQQINVODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

0.87

+0.50

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

-0.77

+3.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.12

-1.20

+14.32

QQQI vs. NVO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQI Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is higher than the NVO Sharpe Ratio of -0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQI and NVO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQQI vs. NVO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQI drawdown since its inception was -20.00%, smaller than the maximum NVO drawdown of -74.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQI and NVO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQINVODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.00%

-74.70%

+54.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.61%

-50.59%

+40.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-74.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-74.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-74.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.49%

-68.62%

+68.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.20%

-17.81%

+15.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

32.66%

-30.42%

Volatility

QQQI vs. NVO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) is 7.05%, while Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO) has a volatility of 10.13%. This indicates that QQQI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQINVODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.05%

10.13%

-3.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.81%

37.86%

-26.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.49%

51.56%

-37.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.45%

38.34%

-20.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.45%

32.53%

-15.08%

Dividends

QQQI vs. NVO - Dividend Comparison

QQQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.55%, more than NVO's 4.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NVO
Novo Nordisk A/S
4.17%3.31%1.68%1.00%1.20%1.35%1.87%2.14%1.45%1.52%2.87%0.92%
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
14.55%13.82%12.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQI and NVO have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVO has higher volatility (10.13%) compared to QQQI (7.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQI dropped -20.00% vs NVO's -74.70%.

QQQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs -0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQI and NVO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer