PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQI vs. GOOY
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QQQI vs. GOOY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) and YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QQQI vs. GOOY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
-3.32%18.62%19.83%
GOOY
YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF
-3.09%53.95%8.69%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQI achieves a -3.32% return, which is significantly lower than GOOY's -3.09% return.


QQQI

1D
0.14%
1M
-2.23%
YTD
-3.32%
6M
-1.12%
1Y
20.78%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GOOY

1D
-0.59%
1M
-1.61%
YTD
-3.09%
6M
17.12%
1Y
70.66%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QQQI vs. GOOY - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than GOOY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QQQI vs. GOOY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQI
QQQI Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
QQQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQI Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQI Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

GOOY
GOOY Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
GOOY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOY Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOY Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQI vs. GOOY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) and YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQIGOOYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.06

2.88

-1.82

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.64

3.74

-2.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.49

-0.25

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.88

4.36

-2.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.37

16.94

-8.57

QQQI vs. GOOY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQI Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is lower than the GOOY Sharpe Ratio of 2.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQI and GOOY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQIGOOYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.06

2.88

-1.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.91

0.86

+0.04

Correlation

The correlation between QQQI and GOOY is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

QQQI vs. GOOY - Dividend Comparison

QQQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.88%, less than GOOY's 49.14% yield.


TTM202520242023
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
14.88%13.82%12.85%0.00%
GOOY
YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF
49.14%41.50%36.74%7.90%

Drawdowns

QQQI vs. GOOY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQI drawdown since its inception was -20.00%, smaller than the maximum GOOY drawdown of -24.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQI and GOOY.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQIGOOYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.00%

-24.40%

+4.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.61%

-16.15%

+6.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.59%

-10.75%

+5.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.32%

-6.50%

+4.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.57%

4.15%

-1.58%

Volatility

QQQI vs. GOOY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) is 6.04%, while YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF (GOOY) has a volatility of 8.05%. This indicates that QQQI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOOY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QQQIGOOYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.04%

8.05%

-2.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.22%

16.29%

-5.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.71%

24.67%

-4.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.47%

22.88%

-5.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.47%

22.88%

-5.41%