QQQI vs. DIA

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) and DIA (State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQI is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Neos, while DIA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Industrial Average. QQQI is actively managed, while DIA is passively managed. Over the past year, QQQI returned 27.00% vs 23.20% for DIA. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QQQI charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for DIA.

Performance

QQQI vs. DIA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) and State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQI achieves a 10.58% return, which is significantly higher than DIA's 7.27% return.

QQQI

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: -0.22%
• YTD: 10.58%
• 6M: 11.20%
• 1Y: 27.00%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DIA

• 1D: 0.73%
• 1M: 2.50%
• YTD: 7.27%
• 6M: 6.43%
• 1Y: 23.20%
• 3Y*: 16.29%
• 5Y*: 10.14%
• 10Y*: 13.40%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQI vs. DIA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	10.58%	18.62%	19.44%
DIA State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust	7.27%	14.71%	12.83%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQI and DIA is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2024	0.66

The correlation between QQQI and DIA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

QQQI vs. DIA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QQQI	DIA
Technology	58.1%	19.1%
Communication Services	14.2%	1.8%
Consumer Cyclical	11.3%	11.0%
Consumer Defensive	6.5%	4.1%
Healthcare	3.9%	12.8%
Industrials	3.0%	18.1%
Utilities	1.3%	-
Basic Materials	1.0%	3.7%
Energy	0.5%	2.2%
Financial Services	0.2%	27.3%
Real Estate	0.1%	-

Return for Risk

QQQI vs. DIA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQI

QQQI Risk / Return Rank: 65
QQQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
QQQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
QQQI Omega Ratio Rank: 67
QQQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
QQQI Martin Ratio Rank: 72

DIA

DIA Risk / Return Rank: 55
DIA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
DIA Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
DIA Omega Ratio Rank: 55
DIA Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
DIA Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQI vs. DIA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) and State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QQQI	DIA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.84	1.69	+0.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.43	2.46	-0.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.30	+0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.70	2.16	+0.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.63	8.35	+3.28

QQQI vs. DIA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQI Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the DIA Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQI and DIA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QQQI vs. DIA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQI drawdown since its inception was -20.00%, smaller than the maximum DIA drawdown of -51.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQI and DIA.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQQI	DIA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.00%	-51.87%	+31.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.61%	-9.76%	+0.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.95%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.76%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.70%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.69%	-0.70%	-1.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.21%	-7.14%	+4.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.23%	2.53%	-0.30%

Volatility

QQQI vs. DIA - Volatility Comparison

NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) has a higher volatility of 6.10% compared to State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA) at 4.32%. This indicates that QQQI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQQI	DIA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.10%	4.32%	+1.78%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.35%	9.78%	+1.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.10%	12.52%	+1.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.34%	14.85%	+2.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.34%	17.56%	-0.22%

QQQI vs. DIA - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than DIA's 0.16% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQQI vs. DIA - Dividend Comparison

QQQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.53%, more than DIA's 1.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DIA State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust	1.37%	1.43%	1.61%	1.81%	1.91%	1.58%	1.87%	1.85%	2.24%	1.97%	2.26%	2.33%
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	13.53%	13.82%	12.85%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQQI and DIA in my portfolio?

QQQI and DIA have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QQQI or DIA?

QQQI has higher volatility (6.10%) compared to DIA (4.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQI dropped -20.00% vs DIA's -51.87%.

Which ETF is better, QQQI or DIA?

On 1-year performance, QQQI leads with 27.00% vs 23.20% for DIA. On fees, DIA is cheaper at 0.16% per year. On volatility, DIA has been the lower-risk option at 4.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QQQI or DIA?

Over the 1-year period, QQQI has performed better with a 27.00% return vs 23.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQQI or DIA?

DIA is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for QQQI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQQI or DIA?

QQQI has the higher dividend yield at 13.53%, compared with 1.37% for DIA.

What is the main difference between QQQI and DIA?

QQQI is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while DIA is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Neos and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for QQQI and 0.16% for DIA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.