PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQI vs. BND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQI vs. BND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQI achieves a 8.55% return, which is significantly higher than BND's -0.05% return.


QQQI

1D
-3.97%
1M
0.08%
YTD
8.55%
6M
7.71%
1Y
25.24%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BND

1D
-0.45%
1M
-0.64%
YTD
-0.05%
6M
0.11%
1Y
4.33%
3Y*
3.80%
5Y*
0.02%
10Y*
1.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQI vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
8.55%18.62%19.83%
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
-0.05%7.08%1.98%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQI and BND is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2024

0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQI vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQI
QQQI Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
QQQI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQI Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQI Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQI Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

BND
BND Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
BND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BND Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
BND Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
BND Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
BND Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQI vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQIBNDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.20

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.64

1.62

+1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.74

4.86

+6.88

QQQI vs. BND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQI Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is higher than the BND Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQI and BND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQIBNDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87

1.16

+0.71

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.18

0.58

+0.60

Drawdowns

QQQI vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQI drawdown since its inception was -20.00%, which is greater than BND's maximum drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQI and BND.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQIBNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.00%

-18.58%

-1.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.61%

-2.68%

-6.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.47%

-2.67%

-1.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.20%

-3.06%

+0.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.15%

0.89%

+1.26%

Volatility

QQQI vs. BND - Volatility Comparison

NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) has a higher volatility of 4.92% compared to Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) at 1.23%. This indicates that QQQI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQIBNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.92%

1.23%

+3.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.68%

2.70%

+7.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.61%

3.76%

+9.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.25%

6.02%

+11.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.25%

5.53%

+11.72%

QQQI vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQQI vs. BND - Dividend Comparison

QQQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.79%, more than BND's 3.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
3.98%3.86%3.67%3.09%2.60%2.12%2.38%2.72%2.81%2.54%2.51%2.57%
QQQI
NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
13.79%13.82%12.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQI and BND have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQI has higher volatility (4.92%) compared to BND (1.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQI dropped -20.00% vs BND's -18.58%.

On 1-year performance, QQQI leads with 25.24% vs 4.33% for BND. On fees, BND is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, BND has been the lower-risk option at 1.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQQI has performed better with a 25.24% return vs 4.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BND is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for QQQI.

QQQI has the higher dividend yield at 13.79%, compared with 3.98% for BND.

QQQI is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while BND is Total Bond Market. They also come from different issuers: Neos and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for QQQI and 0.03% for BND.

QQQI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQI and BND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer