QQQI vs. BINC
QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) and BINC (iShares Flexible Income Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQI is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Neos, while BINC is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by iShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, QQQI returned 30.39% vs 5.90% for BINC. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QQQI charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for BINC.
Performance
QQQI vs. BINC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQI achieves a 13.53% return, which is significantly higher than BINC's 1.29% return.
QQQI
- 1D
- 2.67%
- 1M
- 3.39%
- YTD
- 13.53%
- 6M
- 14.57%
- 1Y
- 30.39%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BINC
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.92%
- YTD
- 1.29%
- 6M
- 1.78%
- 1Y
- 5.90%
- 3Y*
- 7.04%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQI vs. BINC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 13.53% | 18.62% | 19.44% |
BINC iShares Flexible Income Active ETF | 1.29% | 7.57% | 5.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQI and BINC is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2024 | 0.36 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQI vs. BINC — Risk / Return Rank
QQQI
BINC
QQQI vs. BINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) and iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QQQI | BINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.52 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.18 | 2.20 | +0.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.66 | 8.60 | +5.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QQQI vs. BINC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQI drawdown since its inception was -20.00%, which is greater than BINC's maximum drawdown of -2.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQI and BINC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQI | BINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.00% | -2.69% | -17.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.61% | -2.69% | -6.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -2.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.09% | -0.10% | +0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.21% | -0.36% | -1.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.23% | 0.69% | +1.54% |
Volatility
QQQI vs. BINC - Volatility Comparison
NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (QQQI) has a higher volatility of 6.63% compared to iShares Flexible Income Active ETF (BINC) at 0.75%. This indicates that QQQI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BINC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQI | BINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.63% | 0.75% | +5.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.63% | 1.87% | +9.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.33% | 2.30% | +12.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.41% | 2.99% | +14.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.41% | 2.99% | +14.42% |
QQQI vs. BINC - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQI has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than BINC's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQQI vs. BINC - Dividend Comparison
QQQI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.18%, more than BINC's 5.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BINC iShares Flexible Income Active ETF | 5.84% | 5.86% | 6.14% | 3.13% |
QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 13.18% | 13.82% | 12.85% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQI and BINC have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQI has higher volatility (6.63%) compared to BINC (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQI dropped -20.00% vs BINC's -2.69%.
On 1-year performance, QQQI leads with 30.39% vs 5.90% for BINC. On fees, BINC is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, BINC has been the lower-risk option at 0.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QQQI has performed better with a 30.39% return vs 5.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BINC is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for QQQI.
QQQI has the higher dividend yield at 13.18%, compared with 5.84% for BINC.
QQQI is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while BINC is Multisector Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Neos and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for QQQI and 0.40% for BINC.
BINC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQQI and BINC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer