QQQH vs. SMAX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QQQH (NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF) and SMAX (iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Sep ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQH is a Nasdaq-100 fund managed by Neos, while SMAX is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by iShares. Over the past year, QQQH returned 20.09% vs 9.17% for SMAX. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QQQH charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for SMAX.

Performance

QQQH vs. SMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Sep ETF (SMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQH achieves a 7.91% return, which is significantly higher than SMAX's 3.09% return.

QQQH

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 4.93%
• YTD: 7.91%
• 6M: 7.82%
• 1Y: 20.09%
• 3Y*: 20.71%
• 5Y*: 9.42%
• 10Y*: —

SMAX

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 1.09%
• YTD: 3.09%
• 6M: 3.54%
• 1Y: 9.17%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQH vs. SMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QQQH NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF	7.91%	14.17%	4.48%
SMAX iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Sep ETF	3.09%	8.01%	1.02%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQH and SMAX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2024	0.81

The correlation between QQQH and SMAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

QQQH vs. SMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQH

QQQH Risk / Return Rank: 62
QQQH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
QQQH Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
QQQH Omega Ratio Rank: 63
QQQH Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
QQQH Martin Ratio Rank: 67

SMAX

SMAX Risk / Return Rank: 93
SMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
SMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
SMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 95
SMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
SMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQH vs. SMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH) and iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Sep ETF (SMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QQQH	SMAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.09	3.46	-1.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.85	5.32	-2.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.75	-0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.90	4.81	-1.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.60	26.11	-13.51
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QQQH vs. SMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQH Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is lower than the SMAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQH and SMAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QQQH	SMAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.09	3.46	-1.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.79	2.01	-1.22

Drawdowns

QQQH vs. SMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQH drawdown since its inception was -31.24%, which is greater than SMAX's maximum drawdown of -3.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQH and SMAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQQH	SMAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.24%	-3.90%	-27.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.96%	-1.91%	-5.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.18%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.24%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.02%	-0.09%	+0.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.27%	-0.40%	-7.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.60%	0.35%	+1.25%

Volatility

QQQH vs. SMAX - Volatility Comparison

NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH) has a higher volatility of 1.73% compared to iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Sep ETF (SMAX) at 0.38%. This indicates that QQQH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQQH	SMAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.73%	0.38%	+1.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.34%	2.10%	+5.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.67%	2.67%	+7.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.20%	3.67%	+9.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.37%	3.67%	+9.70%

QQQH vs. SMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQH has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than SMAX's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQQH vs. SMAX - Dividend Comparison

QQQH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.74%, more than SMAX's 0.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
QQQH NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF	8.74%	8.86%	7.53%	7.18%	9.05%	7.77%	7.48%	0.65%
SMAX iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Sep ETF	0.95%	0.98%	0.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQQH and SMAX in my portfolio?

QQQH and SMAX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QQQH or SMAX?

QQQH has higher volatility (1.73%) compared to SMAX (0.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQH dropped -31.24% vs SMAX's -3.90%.

Which ETF is better, QQQH or SMAX?

On 1-year performance, QQQH leads with 20.09% vs 9.17% for SMAX. On fees, SMAX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, SMAX has been the lower-risk option at 0.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QQQH or SMAX?

Over the 1-year period, QQQH has performed better with a 20.09% return vs 9.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQQH or SMAX?

SMAX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for QQQH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQQH or SMAX?

QQQH has the higher dividend yield at 8.74%, compared with 0.95% for SMAX.

What is the main difference between QQQH and SMAX?

QQQH is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SMAX is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Neos and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for QQQH and 0.50% for SMAX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SMAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.46 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.