PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SMAX vs. TQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SMAX vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Sep ETF (SMAX) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SMAX vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SMAX
iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Sep ETF
-0.49%8.01%1.02%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
-20.81%34.35%14.37%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SMAX achieves a -0.49% return, which is significantly higher than TQQQ's -20.81% return.


SMAX

1D
0.72%
1M
-1.17%
YTD
-0.49%
6M
1.14%
1Y
8.16%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TQQQ

1D
10.00%
1M
-15.69%
YTD
-20.81%
6M
-19.12%
1Y
46.49%
3Y*
45.09%
5Y*
12.72%
10Y*
34.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SMAX vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SMAX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SMAX vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SMAX
SMAX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
SMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
SMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SMAX vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Sep ETF (SMAX) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SMAXTQQQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.15

0.69

+1.45

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.26

1.37

+1.88

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.19

+0.29

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.67

1.25

+2.42

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.23

3.87

+13.36

SMAX vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SMAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is higher than the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SMAX and TQQQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SMAXTQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

0.69

+1.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.50

0.64

+0.86

Correlation

The correlation between SMAX and TQQQ is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

SMAX vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

SMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, more than TQQQ's 0.76% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SMAX
iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Sep ETF
0.98%0.98%0.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.76%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Drawdowns

SMAX vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SMAX drawdown since its inception was -3.90%, smaller than the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SMAX and TQQQ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SMAXTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.90%

-81.66%

+77.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.27%

-36.97%

+34.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-81.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.21%

-30.66%

+29.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.43%

-18.66%

+18.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.48%

12.00%

-11.52%

Volatility

SMAX vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Sep ETF (SMAX) is 1.30%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 19.43%. This indicates that SMAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SMAXTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.30%

19.43%

-18.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.14%

38.32%

-36.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.82%

67.26%

-63.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.80%

66.55%

-62.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.80%

65.83%

-62.03%