QQQH vs. OILK
QQQH (NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF) and OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQH is a Nasdaq-100 fund managed by Neos, while OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. Over the past 5 years, QQQH returned 9.42%/yr vs 17.73%/yr for OILK. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.68% expense ratio.
Performance
QQQH vs. OILK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQH achieves a 7.91% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 64.22% return.
QQQH
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 4.93%
- YTD
- 7.91%
- 6M
- 7.82%
- 1Y
- 20.09%
- 3Y*
- 20.71%
- 5Y*
- 9.42%
- 10Y*
- —
OILK
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 64.22%
- 6M
- 60.70%
- 1Y
- 58.99%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- 17.73%
- 10Y*
- —
QQQH vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQH NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF | 7.91% | 14.17% | 25.98% | 30.96% | -28.35% | 9.76% | 18.62% | 0.31% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 64.22% | -11.86% | 8.18% | -0.97% | 27.57% | 63.71% | -61.09% | 1.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQH and OILK is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2019 | 0.10 |
The correlation between QQQH and OILK shifts across timeframes, from -0.23 (1 year) to 0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
QQQH vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QQQH
OILK
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
QQQH
OILK
-
Communication Services
QQQH
OILK
-
Consumer Cyclical
QQQH
OILK
Consumer Defensive
QQQH
OILK
-
Healthcare
QQQH
OILK
-
Industrials
QQQH
OILK
-
Utilities
QQQH
OILK
-
Basic Materials
QQQH
OILK
-
Energy
QQQH
OILK
-
Financial Services
QQQH
OILK
-
Real Estate
QQQH
OILK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQH vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank
QQQH
OILK
QQQH vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQQH | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.34 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.90 | 3.42 | -0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.60 | 6.91 | +5.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQQH | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.09 | 2.06 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 0.59 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 0.12 | +0.67 |
Drawdowns
QQQH vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQH drawdown since its inception was -31.24%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQH and OILK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQH | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.24% | -83.76% | +52.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.96% | -17.35% | +10.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.18% | -23.42% | +8.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.24% | -34.69% | +3.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | -3.66% | +3.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.27% | -32.61% | +24.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.60% | 8.56% | -6.96% |
Volatility
QQQH vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH) is 1.73%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 10.44%. This indicates that QQQH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQH | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.73% | 10.44% | -8.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.34% | 23.26% | -15.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.67% | 28.75% | -19.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.20% | 30.12% | -16.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.37% | 35.97% | -22.60% |
QQQH vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both QQQH and OILK have an expense ratio of 0.68%.
Dividends
QQQH vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison
QQQH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.74%, more than OILK's 8.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 8.18% | 4.79% | 3.11% | 5.80% | 17.32% | 68.82% | 0.13% | 0.94% | 0.58% | 6.17% |
QQQH NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF | 8.74% | 8.86% | 7.53% | 7.18% | 9.05% | 7.77% | 7.48% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQH and OILK have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OILK has higher volatility (10.44%) compared to QQQH (1.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQH dropped -31.24% vs OILK's -83.76%.
On 5-year performance, OILK leads with 17.73% vs 9.42% for QQQH. Both ETFs have the same 0.68% expense ratio. On volatility, QQQH has been the lower-risk option at 1.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, OILK has performed better with a 17.73% return vs 9.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQH and OILK have the same expense ratio: 0.68% per year.
QQQH has the higher dividend yield at 8.74%, compared with 8.18% for OILK.
QQQH is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while OILK is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Neos and ProShares.
QQQH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQQH and OILK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer