PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQH vs. IAUI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQH vs. IAUI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH) and NEOS Gold High Income ETF (IAUI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQH achieves a 7.91% return, which is significantly higher than IAUI's 1.64% return.


QQQH

1D
-0.02%
1M
4.93%
YTD
7.91%
6M
7.82%
1Y
20.09%
3Y*
20.71%
5Y*
9.42%
10Y*

IAUI

1D
-0.88%
1M
-1.01%
YTD
1.64%
6M
4.00%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQH vs. IAUI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
QQQH
NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF
7.91%11.55%
IAUI
NEOS Gold High Income ETF
1.64%20.56%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQH and IAUI is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2025

0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQH vs. IAUI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQH
QQQH Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
QQQH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQH Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQH Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQH Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

IAUI
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQH vs. IAUI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH) and NEOS Gold High Income ETF (IAUI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQHIAUIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.60

QQQH vs. IAUI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQHIAUIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

1.13

-0.34

Drawdowns

QQQH vs. IAUI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQH drawdown since its inception was -31.24%, which is greater than IAUI's maximum drawdown of -16.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQH and IAUI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQHIAUIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.24%

-16.88%

-14.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

-13.80%

+13.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.27%

-3.45%

-4.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.60%

Volatility

QQQH vs. IAUI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQHIAUIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.67%

20.31%

-10.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.20%

20.31%

-7.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.37%

20.31%

-6.94%

QQQH vs. IAUI - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQH has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than IAUI's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQQH vs. IAUI - Dividend Comparison

QQQH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.74%, less than IAUI's 12.65% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
IAUI
NEOS Gold High Income ETF
12.65%6.88%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQH
NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF
8.74%8.86%7.53%7.18%9.05%7.77%7.48%0.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQH and IAUI have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QQQH is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QQQH is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for IAUI.

IAUI has the higher dividend yield at 12.65%, compared with 8.74% for QQQH.

QQQH is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while IAUI is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for QQQH and 0.78% for IAUI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQH and IAUI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer