QQQH vs. DBE
QQQH (NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF) and DBE (Invesco DB Energy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQH is a Nasdaq-100 fund managed by Neos, while DBE is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the DBIQ Optimum Yield Energy Index. Over the past 5 years, QQQH returned 9.42%/yr vs 19.66%/yr for DBE. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QQQH charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for DBE.
Performance
QQQH vs. DBE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQH achieves a 7.91% return, which is significantly lower than DBE's 83.68% return.
QQQH
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 4.93%
- YTD
- 7.91%
- 6M
- 7.82%
- 1Y
- 20.09%
- 3Y*
- 20.71%
- 5Y*
- 9.42%
- 10Y*
- —
DBE
- 1D
- 2.33%
- 1M
- -5.45%
- YTD
- 83.68%
- 6M
- 74.95%
- 1Y
- 84.41%
- 3Y*
- 23.42%
- 5Y*
- 19.66%
- 10Y*
- 12.03%
QQQH vs. DBE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQH NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF | 7.91% | 14.17% | 25.98% | 30.96% | -28.35% | 9.76% | 18.62% | 0.31% |
DBE Invesco DB Energy Fund | 83.68% | -2.17% | 2.96% | -12.14% | 33.77% | 57.56% | -25.91% | 0.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQH and DBE is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2019 | 0.09 |
The correlation between QQQH and DBE shifts across timeframes, from -0.26 (1 year) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQH vs. DBE — Risk / Return Rank
QQQH
DBE
QQQH vs. DBE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH) and Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQQH | DBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.40 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.90 | 5.89 | -2.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.60 | 11.53 | +1.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQQH | DBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.09 | 2.43 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 0.67 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 0.09 | +0.69 |
Drawdowns
QQQH vs. DBE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQH drawdown since its inception was -31.24%, smaller than the maximum DBE drawdown of -86.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQH and DBE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQH | DBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.24% | -86.69% | +55.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.96% | -14.41% | +7.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.18% | -23.89% | +8.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.24% | -38.74% | +7.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -60.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | -30.27% | +30.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.27% | -57.31% | +49.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.60% | 7.35% | -5.75% |
Volatility
QQQH vs. DBE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH) is 1.73%, while Invesco DB Energy Fund (DBE) has a volatility of 12.95%. This indicates that QQQH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQH | DBE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.73% | 12.95% | -11.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.34% | 30.86% | -23.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.67% | 34.97% | -25.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.20% | 29.39% | -16.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.37% | 28.33% | -14.96% |
QQQH vs. DBE - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQH has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than DBE's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQQH vs. DBE - Dividend Comparison
QQQH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.74%, more than DBE's 2.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBE Invesco DB Energy Fund | 2.10% | 3.86% | 6.32% | 3.87% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.79% | 1.67% |
QQQH NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF | 8.74% | 8.86% | 7.53% | 7.18% | 9.05% | 7.77% | 7.48% | 0.65% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQH and DBE have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DBE has higher volatility (12.95%) compared to QQQH (1.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQH dropped -31.24% vs DBE's -86.69%.
On 5-year performance, DBE leads with 19.66% vs 9.42% for QQQH. On fees, QQQH is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, QQQH has been the lower-risk option at 1.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DBE has performed better with a 19.66% return vs 9.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQH is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for DBE.
QQQH has the higher dividend yield at 8.74%, compared with 2.10% for DBE.
QQQH is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while DBE is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Neos and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for QQQH and 0.78% for DBE.
DBE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQQH and DBE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer