QQQH vs. CRF

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

QQQH (NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF) and CRF (Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc.) are both funds - QQQH is a Nasdaq-100 fund managed by Neos, while CRF is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Cornerstone. Over the past 5 years, QQQH returned 8.74%/yr vs 9.57%/yr for CRF. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QQQH charges 0.68%/yr vs 1.84%/yr for CRF.

Performance

QQQH vs. CRF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH) and Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. (CRF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQH achieves a 6.04% return, which is significantly higher than CRF's -3.31% return.

QQQH

• 1D: 0.43%
• 1M: 0.39%
• YTD: 6.04%
• 6M: 6.64%
• 1Y: 17.03%
• 3Y*: 19.00%
• 5Y*: 8.74%
• 10Y*: —

CRF

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: -1.82%
• YTD: -3.31%
• 6M: -1.76%
• 1Y: 11.58%
• 3Y*: 15.78%
• 5Y*: 9.57%
• 10Y*: 11.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQH vs. CRF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
QQQH NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF	6.04%	14.17%	25.98%	30.96%	-28.35%	9.76%	18.62%	0.47%
CRF Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc.	-3.31%	12.46%	44.39%	19.49%	-36.70%	39.73%	28.13%	1.48%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQH and CRF is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.50
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2019	0.47

The correlation between QQQH and CRF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

QQQH vs. CRF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQH

QQQH Risk / Return Rank: 58
QQQH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
QQQH Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
QQQH Omega Ratio Rank: 59
QQQH Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
QQQH Martin Ratio Rank: 65

CRF

CRF Risk / Return Rank: 13
CRF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
CRF Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
CRF Omega Ratio Rank: 15
CRF Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
CRF Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQH vs. CRF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH) and Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. (CRF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QQQH	CRF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.66	0.75	+0.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.25	1.14	+1.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.15	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.46	0.78	+1.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.33	2.59	+7.74

QQQH vs. CRF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQH Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is higher than the CRF Sharpe Ratio of 0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQH and CRF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QQQH vs. CRF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQH drawdown since its inception was -31.24%, smaller than the maximum CRF drawdown of -80.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQH and CRF.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQQH	CRF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.24%	-80.70%	+49.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.96%	-14.88%	+7.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.18%	-29.66%	+14.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.24%	-43.12%	+11.88%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-45.90%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.75%	-5.09%	+3.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.24%	-22.31%	+14.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.65%	4.48%	-2.83%

Volatility

QQQH vs. CRF - Volatility Comparison

NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH) and Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc. (CRF) have volatilities of 4.05% and 4.16%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQQH	CRF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.05%	4.16%	-0.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.20%	13.41%	-5.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.32%	15.41%	-5.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.28%	25.07%	-11.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.42%	25.86%	-12.44%

QQQH vs. CRF - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQH has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than CRF's 1.84% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQQH vs. CRF - Dividend Comparison

QQQH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.89%, less than CRF's 19.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CRF Cornerstone Total Return Fund, Inc.	19.63%	17.38%	14.32%	19.94%	29.31%	13.41%	18.91%	21.67%	24.85%	17.96%	24.08%	23.58%
QQQH NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF	8.89%	8.86%	7.53%	7.18%	9.05%	7.77%	7.48%	0.65%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQQH and CRF in my portfolio?

QQQH and CRF have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QQQH or CRF?

CRF has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to QQQH (4.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQH dropped -31.24% vs CRF's -80.70%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.