QQQG vs. FCGSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) and Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX).
QQQG is an actively managed fund by Pacer. It was launched on Aug 19, 2024. FCGSX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 7, 2013.
Performance
QQQG vs. FCGSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QQQG vs. FCGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QQQG Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF | -6.74% | 14.72% | 2.23% |
FCGSX Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund | -6.64% | 25.52% | 8.95% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with QQQG having a -6.74% return and FCGSX slightly higher at -6.64%.
QQQG
- 1D
- 3.98%
- 1M
- -4.32%
- YTD
- -6.74%
- 6M
- -6.59%
- 1Y
- 16.70%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FCGSX
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- -8.19%
- YTD
- -6.64%
- 6M
- -2.02%
- 1Y
- 33.82%
- 3Y*
- 27.05%
- 5Y*
- 14.28%
- 10Y*
- 21.43%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QQQG vs. FCGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FCGSX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QQQG vs. FCGSX — Risk / Return Rank
QQQG
FCGSX
QQQG vs. FCGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) and Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQQG | FCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.66 | 1.40 | -0.74 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.12 | 2.02 | -0.90 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.29 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.17 | 2.25 | -1.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.99 | 10.23 | -6.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQQG | FCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 | 1.40 | -0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.93 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 0.87 | -0.62 |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQG and FCGSX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
QQQG vs. FCGSX - Dividend Comparison
QQQG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than FCGSX's 11.22% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQG Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF | 0.06% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FCGSX Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund | 11.22% | 10.48% | 12.49% | 3.13% | 0.61% | 38.65% | 31.99% | 11.06% | 13.21% | 10.51% | 2.44% | 0.25% |
Drawdowns
QQQG vs. FCGSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQG drawdown since its inception was -23.61%, smaller than the maximum FCGSX drawdown of -38.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQG and FCGSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQG | FCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.61% | -38.77% | +15.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.79% | -13.10% | -0.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.36% | -10.42% | +0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.84% | -7.05% | +3.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.04% | 2.88% | +1.16% |
Volatility
QQQG vs. FCGSX - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) has a higher volatility of 8.05% compared to Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX) at 6.66%. This indicates that QQQG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QQQG | FCGSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.05% | 6.66% | +1.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.72% | 13.74% | +1.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.24% | 23.80% | +1.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.62% | 23.62% | 0.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.62% | 23.15% | +0.47% |