QQQG vs. COWZ
Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ).
QQQG and COWZ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QQQG is an actively managed fund by Pacer. It was launched on Aug 19, 2024. COWZ is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 2016.
Performance
QQQG vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QQQG vs. COWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
QQQG Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF | -5.14% | 14.72% | 2.23% |
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 3.91% | 8.98% | 1.90% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQG achieves a -5.14% return, which is significantly lower than COWZ's 3.91% return.
QQQG
- 1D
- 1.72%
- 1M
- -2.17%
- YTD
- -5.14%
- 6M
- -5.30%
- 1Y
- 17.73%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COWZ
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- -3.51%
- YTD
- 3.91%
- 6M
- 9.24%
- 1Y
- 16.64%
- 3Y*
- 12.12%
- 5Y*
- 10.92%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QQQG vs. COWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both QQQG and COWZ have an expense ratio of 0.49%.
Return for Risk
QQQG vs. COWZ — Risk / Return Rank
QQQG
COWZ
QQQG vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQQG | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.70 | 0.96 | -0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.18 | 1.43 | -0.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.21 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.36 | 1.20 | +0.15 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.58 | 5.59 | -1.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQQG | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 | 0.96 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.63 | -0.34 |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQG and COWZ is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
QQQG vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison
QQQG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than COWZ's 2.07% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQG Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF | 0.06% | 0.06% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
COWZ Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF | 2.07% | 2.19% | 1.82% | 1.92% | 1.96% | 1.48% | 2.54% | 1.96% | 1.67% | 1.95% | 0.13% |
Drawdowns
QQQG vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQG drawdown since its inception was -23.61%, smaller than the maximum COWZ drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQG and COWZ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQG | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.61% | -38.63% | +15.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.79% | -13.55% | -0.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.00% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.82% | -3.72% | -5.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.85% | -4.85% | +1.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.08% | 2.92% | +1.16% |
Volatility
QQQG vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) has a higher volatility of 8.02% compared to Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) at 2.96%. This indicates that QQQG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QQQG | COWZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.02% | 2.96% | +5.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.82% | 8.37% | +7.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.29% | 17.50% | +7.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.63% | 17.73% | +5.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.63% | 20.08% | +3.55% |