QQQG vs. CCOR

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR).

QQQG and CCOR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QQQG is an actively managed fund by Pacer. It was launched on Aug 19, 2024. CCOR is an actively managed fund by Core Alternative Capital. It was launched on May 24, 2017.

Performance

QQQG vs. CCOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

QQQG vs. CCOR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QQQG Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF	-6.74%	14.72%	2.23%
CCOR Core Alternative ETF	-0.34%	3.52%	-5.17%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQG achieves a -6.74% return, which is significantly lower than CCOR's -0.34% return.

QQQG

• 1D: 3.98%
• 1M: -4.32%
• YTD: -6.74%
• 6M: -6.59%
• 1Y: 16.70%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CCOR

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: -4.07%
• YTD: -0.34%
• 6M: 0.35%
• 1Y: -1.48%
• 3Y*: -3.32%
• 5Y*: -0.93%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQG vs. CCOR - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQG has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than CCOR's 1.09% expense ratio.

CCOR

Core Alternative ETF

QQQG

Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF

Return for Risk

QQQG vs. CCOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQG

QQQG Risk / Return Rank: 42
QQQG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
QQQG Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
QQQG Omega Ratio Rank: 40
QQQG Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
QQQG Martin Ratio Rank: 43

CCOR

CCOR Risk / Return Rank: 9
CCOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
CCOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
CCOR Omega Ratio Rank: 8
CCOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
CCOR Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQG vs. CCOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QQQG	CCOR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.66	-0.14	+0.80
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.12	-0.14	+1.26
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	0.98	+0.17
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.17	-0.19	+1.36
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.99	-0.35	+4.33
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QQQG vs. CCOR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQG Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is higher than the CCOR Sharpe Ratio of -0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQG and CCOR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QQQG	CCOR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66	-0.14	+0.80
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.08	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.24	0.15	+0.09

Correlation

The correlation between QQQG and CCOR is -0.07. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

QQQG vs. CCOR - Dividend Comparison

QQQG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than CCOR's 1.07% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
QQQG Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF	0.06%	0.06%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CCOR Core Alternative ETF	1.07%	1.07%	1.18%	1.21%	1.11%	1.02%	1.50%	0.73%	1.53%	0.89%

Drawdowns

QQQG vs. CCOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQG drawdown since its inception was -23.61%, roughly equal to the maximum CCOR drawdown of -22.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQG and CCOR.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQQG	CCOR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.61%	-22.99%	-0.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.79%	-9.17%	-4.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.99%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.36%	-17.23%	+6.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.84%	-7.07%	+3.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.04%	4.95%	-0.91%

Volatility

QQQG vs. CCOR - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) has a higher volatility of 8.05% compared to Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) at 2.17%. This indicates that QQQG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQQG	CCOR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.05%	2.17%	+5.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.72%	5.44%	+10.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.24%	10.74%	+14.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.62%	11.13%	+12.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.62%	10.81%	+12.81%