PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQA vs. UVXY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQA vs. UVXY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA) and ProShares Ultra VIX Short-Term Futures ETF (UVXY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQA achieves a 42.37% return, which is significantly higher than UVXY's -29.20% return.


QQQA

1D
-0.45%
1M
-15.08%
6M
34.74%
YTD
42.37%
1Y
58.31%
3Y*
24.51%
5Y*
11.64%
10Y*

UVXY

1D
8.81%
1M
-7.29%
6M
-28.42%
YTD
-29.20%
1Y
-70.71%
3Y*
-60.83%
5Y*
-67.79%
10Y*
-71.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQA vs. UVXY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QQQA
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF
42.37%9.87%16.17%24.98%-29.08%9.84%
UVXY
ProShares Ultra VIX Short-Term Futures ETF
-29.20%-65.32%-50.90%-87.70%-44.81%-74.58%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQA and UVXY is -0.57, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2021

-0.63

The correlation between QQQA and UVXY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.63 to -0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQA vs. UVXY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQA
QQQA Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
QQQA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQA Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQA Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

UVXY
UVXY Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
UVXY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UVXY Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
UVXY Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
UVXY Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
UVXY Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQA vs. UVXY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA) and ProShares Ultra VIX Short-Term Futures ETF (UVXY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QQQAUVXYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.66

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

0.84

+0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.15

-0.96

+4.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.47

-1.43

+12.89

QQQA vs. UVXY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQA Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is higher than the UVXY Sharpe Ratio of -0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQA and UVXY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQQA vs. UVXY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQA drawdown since its inception was -38.44%, smaller than the maximum UVXY drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQA and UVXY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQAUVXYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.44%

-100.00%

+61.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.63%

-73.88%

+55.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.84%

-95.42%

+64.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.44%

-99.75%

+61.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-100.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.63%

-100.00%

+81.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.48%

-98.76%

+83.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.10%

49.63%

-44.53%

Volatility

QQQA vs. UVXY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA) is 15.85%, while ProShares Ultra VIX Short-Term Futures ETF (UVXY) has a volatility of 19.34%. This indicates that QQQA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UVXY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQAUVXYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.85%

19.34%

-3.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.97%

67.22%

-37.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.18%

85.95%

-52.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.38%

103.85%

-76.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.07%

112.04%

-84.97%

QQQA vs. UVXY - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQA has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than UVXY's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQQA vs. UVXY - Dividend Comparison

QQQA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.03%, while UVXY has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
QQQA
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF
0.03%0.10%0.09%0.34%0.28%0.10%
UVXY
ProShares Ultra VIX Short-Term Futures ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQA and UVXY have a correlation of -0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UVXY has higher volatility (19.34%) compared to QQQA (15.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQA dropped -38.44% vs UVXY's -100.00%.

On 5-year performance, QQQA leads with 11.64% vs -67.79% for UVXY. On fees, QQQA is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, QQQA has been the lower-risk option at 15.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QQQA has performed better with a 11.64% return vs -67.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQA is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UVXY.

QQQA has the higher dividend yield at 0.03%, compared with 0.00% for UVXY.

QQQA is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while UVXY is Volatility. QQQA tracks NASDAQ-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while UVXY tracks S&P 500 VIX SHORT-TERM FUTURES TR (150%). Their fees differ too: 0.58% for QQQA and 0.95% for UVXY.

QQQA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs -0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQA and UVXY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer