PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQA vs. CCOR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QQQA vs. CCOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QQQA vs. CCOR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QQQA
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF
1.42%9.87%16.17%24.98%-29.08%8.43%
CCOR
Core Alternative ETF
-0.34%3.52%-5.70%-11.92%2.51%3.26%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQA achieves a 1.42% return, which is significantly higher than CCOR's -0.34% return.


QQQA

1D
4.97%
1M
-5.23%
YTD
1.42%
6M
8.28%
1Y
24.06%
3Y*
16.37%
5Y*
10Y*

CCOR

1D
0.65%
1M
-4.07%
YTD
-0.34%
6M
0.35%
1Y
-1.48%
3Y*
-3.32%
5Y*
-0.93%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QQQA vs. CCOR - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQA has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than CCOR's 1.09% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

QQQA vs. CCOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQA
QQQA Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
QQQA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQA Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQA Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

CCOR
CCOR Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
CCOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCOR Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
CCOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCOR Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQA vs. CCOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA) and Core Alternative ETF (CCOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQACCORDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.84

-0.14

+0.98

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.31

-0.14

+1.45

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

0.98

+0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.59

-0.19

+1.78

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.51

-0.35

+5.86

QQQA vs. CCOR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQA Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is higher than the CCOR Sharpe Ratio of -0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQA and CCOR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQACCORDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

-0.14

+0.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.15

+0.03

Correlation

The correlation between QQQA and CCOR is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

QQQA vs. CCOR - Dividend Comparison

QQQA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%, less than CCOR's 1.07% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
QQQA
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF
0.10%0.10%0.09%0.34%0.28%0.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CCOR
Core Alternative ETF
1.07%1.07%1.18%1.21%1.11%1.02%1.50%0.73%1.53%0.89%

Drawdowns

QQQA vs. CCOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQA drawdown since its inception was -38.44%, which is greater than CCOR's maximum drawdown of -22.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQA and CCOR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQACCORDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.44%

-22.99%

-15.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.54%

-9.17%

-5.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.29%

-17.23%

+6.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.19%

-7.07%

-9.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.19%

4.95%

-0.76%

Volatility

QQQA vs. CCOR - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA) has a higher volatility of 11.40% compared to Core Alternative ETF (CCOR) at 2.17%. This indicates that QQQA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QQQACCORDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.40%

2.17%

+9.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.70%

5.44%

+15.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.75%

10.74%

+18.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.37%

11.13%

+14.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.37%

10.81%

+14.56%