QQQ vs. VHT
QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) and VHT (Vanguard Health Care ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while VHT is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QQQ returned 21.79%/yr vs 9.87%/yr for VHT. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QQQ charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VHT.
Performance
QQQ vs. VHT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQ achieves a 17.57% return, which is significantly higher than VHT's -0.11% return. Over the past 10 years, QQQ has outperformed VHT with an annualized return of 21.79%, while VHT has yielded a comparatively lower 9.87% annualized return.
QQQ
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 0.93%
- YTD
- 17.57%
- 6M
- 17.85%
- 1Y
- 35.82%
- 3Y*
- 26.43%
- 5Y*
- 16.85%
- 10Y*
- 21.79%
VHT
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 4.39%
- YTD
- -0.11%
- 6M
- 0.45%
- 1Y
- 15.89%
- 3Y*
- 7.19%
- 5Y*
- 4.78%
- 10Y*
- 9.87%
QQQ vs. VHT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 17.57% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF | -0.11% | 15.46% | 2.66% | 2.52% | -5.60% | 20.57% | 18.29% | 21.87% | 5.58% | 23.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQ and VHT is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2004 | 0.67 |
Over the past year, the correlation between QQQ and VHT has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
QQQ vs. VHT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QQQ
VHT
Technology
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Technology
QQQ
VHT
Communication Services
QQQ
VHT
-
Consumer Cyclical
QQQ
VHT
-
Consumer Defensive
QQQ
VHT
-
Healthcare
QQQ
VHT
Industrials
QQQ
VHT
Utilities
QQQ
VHT
-
Basic Materials
QQQ
VHT
-
Energy
QQQ
VHT
-
Financial Services
QQQ
VHT
Real Estate
QQQ
VHT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQ vs. VHT — Risk / Return Rank
QQQ
VHT
QQQ vs. VHT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QQQ | VHT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.19 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.01 | 1.53 | +1.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.22 | 3.81 | +7.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QQQ vs. VHT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQ drawdown since its inception was -82.97%, which is greater than VHT's maximum drawdown of -39.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQ and VHT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQ | VHT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.97% | -39.12% | -43.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.96% | -10.40% | -1.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.77% | -16.91% | -5.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.12% | -17.71% | -17.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.12% | -28.85% | -6.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.33% | -3.28% | -0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.75% | -5.99% | -26.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.20% | 4.19% | -0.99% |
Volatility
QQQ vs. VHT - Volatility Comparison
Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a higher volatility of 7.56% compared to Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) at 4.88%. This indicates that QQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VHT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQ | VHT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.56% | 4.88% | +2.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.81% | 10.46% | +3.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.19% | 14.70% | +2.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.55% | 15.01% | +7.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.38% | 16.97% | +5.41% |
QQQ vs. VHT - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQ has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than VHT's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QQQ vs. VHT - Dividend Comparison
QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than VHT's 1.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF | 1.64% | 1.61% | 1.53% | 1.36% | 1.33% | 1.14% | 1.21% | 1.89% | 1.38% | 1.31% | 1.45% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQ and VHT have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQ has higher volatility (7.56%) compared to VHT (4.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQ dropped -82.97% vs VHT's -39.12%.
On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 21.79% vs 9.87% for VHT. On fees, VHT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VHT has been the lower-risk option at 4.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 21.79% return vs 9.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VHT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for QQQ.
VHT has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.39% for QQQ.
QQQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while VHT is Health & Biotech Equities. QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while VHT tracks MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for QQQ and 0.09% for VHT.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQQ and VHT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer