PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQ vs. URTH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQ vs. URTH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQ achieves a 16.71% return, which is significantly higher than URTH's 8.23% return. Over the past 10 years, QQQ has outperformed URTH with an annualized return of 21.59%, while URTH has yielded a comparatively lower 13.15% annualized return.


QQQ

1D
1.56%
1M
0.68%
YTD
16.71%
6M
15.00%
1Y
35.78%
3Y*
27.15%
5Y*
16.98%
10Y*
21.59%

URTH

1D
0.33%
1M
0.20%
YTD
8.23%
6M
9.02%
1Y
23.15%
3Y*
19.96%
5Y*
11.47%
10Y*
13.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQ vs. URTH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
16.71%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
8.23%21.36%18.66%23.95%-17.97%22.27%15.78%28.15%-8.56%22.95%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQ and URTH is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2012

0.78

The correlation between QQQ and URTH shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (all time) to 0.90 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QQQ vs. URTH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QQQ
URTH

Technology

53.8%
28.3%

Communication Services

15.8%
9.3%

Consumer Cyclical

12.3%
9.3%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
5.2%

Healthcare

4.2%
8.8%

Industrials

2.8%
11.3%

Utilities

1.4%
2.7%

Basic Materials

1.1%
3.3%

Energy

0.6%
4.2%

Financial Services

0.2%
15.8%

Real Estate

0.1%
1.9%

Technology

QQQ
53.8%
URTH
28.3%

Communication Services

QQQ
15.8%
URTH
9.3%

Consumer Cyclical

QQQ
12.3%
URTH
9.3%

Consumer Defensive

QQQ
7.7%
URTH
5.2%

Healthcare

QQQ
4.2%
URTH
8.8%

Industrials

QQQ
2.8%
URTH
11.3%

Utilities

QQQ
1.4%
URTH
2.7%

Basic Materials

QQQ
1.1%
URTH
3.3%

Energy

QQQ
0.6%
URTH
4.2%

Financial Services

QQQ
0.2%
URTH
15.8%

Real Estate

QQQ
0.1%
URTH
1.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQ vs. URTH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

URTH
URTH Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
URTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
URTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
URTH Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
URTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
URTH Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQ vs. URTH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QQQURTHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.34

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

2.57

+0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.43

11.56

-0.13

QQQ vs. URTH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the URTH Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQ and URTH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QQQURTHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

1.89

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.71

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

0.76

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.72

-0.31

Drawdowns

QQQ vs. URTH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQ drawdown since its inception was -82.97%, which is greater than URTH's maximum drawdown of -34.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQ and URTH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQURTHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.97%

-34.01%

-48.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.96%

-9.06%

-2.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.77%

-16.94%

-5.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.12%

-26.05%

-9.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.12%

-34.01%

-1.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.03%

-2.49%

-1.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.77%

-4.37%

-28.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.14%

2.01%

+1.13%

Volatility

QQQ vs. URTH - Volatility Comparison

Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a higher volatility of 6.84% compared to iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH) at 3.82%. This indicates that QQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than URTH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQURTHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.84%

3.82%

+3.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.20%

9.80%

+3.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.74%

12.34%

+4.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.49%

16.22%

+6.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.36%

17.29%

+5.07%

QQQ vs. URTH - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQ has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than URTH's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QQQ vs. URTH - Dividend Comparison

QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than URTH's 1.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.39%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%
URTH
iShares MSCI World ETF
1.37%1.48%1.47%1.70%1.68%1.50%1.52%2.16%2.30%1.88%2.15%2.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQ and URTH have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQ has higher volatility (6.84%) compared to URTH (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQ dropped -82.97% vs URTH's -34.01%.

On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 21.59% vs 13.15% for URTH. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, URTH has been the lower-risk option at 3.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 21.59% return vs 13.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for URTH.

URTH has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.39% for QQQ.

QQQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while URTH is Global Equities. QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while URTH tracks MSCI World Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for QQQ and 0.24% for URTH.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQ and URTH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer