PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
QQQ vs. SRVR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

QQQ vs. SRVR

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) and SRVR (Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while SRVR is a REIT fund tracking the Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QQQ returned 16.85%/yr vs -1.65%/yr for SRVR. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QQQ charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for SRVR.

Performance

QQQ vs. SRVR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQ achieves a 17.57% return, which is significantly lower than SRVR's 18.64% return.

QQQ

1D
0.59%
1M
0.22%
YTD
17.57%
6M
17.85%
1Y
37.55%
3Y*
26.43%
5Y*
16.85%
10Y*
21.79%

SRVR

1D
0.42%
1M
-2.45%
YTD
18.64%
6M
17.26%
1Y
9.20%
3Y*
8.49%
5Y*
-1.65%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQ vs. SRVR - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF		17.57%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-7.48%
SRVR
Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF		18.64%-1.99%2.70%6.84%-31.90%22.31%11.99%41.98%-3.66%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQ and SRVR is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2018

0.53

The correlation between QQQ and SRVR shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (3 years) to 0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

QQQ vs. SRVR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
QQQ
SRVR

Technology

53.8%
6.8%

Communication Services

15.8%
7.5%

Consumer Cyclical

12.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

7.7%

-

Healthcare

4.2%

-

Industrials

2.8%
11.7%

Utilities

1.4%
2.2%

Basic Materials

1.1%
0.8%

Energy

0.6%
3.8%

Financial Services

0.2%
0.9%

Real Estate

0.1%
66.4%

Technology

QQQ
53.8%
SRVR
6.8%

Communication Services

QQQ
15.8%
SRVR
7.5%

Consumer Cyclical

QQQ
12.3%
SRVR

-

Consumer Defensive

QQQ
7.7%
SRVR

-

Healthcare

QQQ
4.2%
SRVR

-

Industrials

QQQ
2.8%
SRVR
11.7%

Utilities

QQQ
1.4%
SRVR
2.2%

Basic Materials

QQQ
1.1%
SRVR
0.8%

Energy

QQQ
0.6%
SRVR
3.8%

Financial Services

QQQ
0.2%
SRVR
0.9%

Real Estate

QQQ
0.1%
SRVR
66.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Invesco QQQ ETF

Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF

Often compared with QQQ:
QQQ vs. SPYQQQ vs. VOOQQQ vs. VGTQQQ vs. TQQQQQQ vs. SMHQQQ vs. QQQMQQQ vs. QQQI
Often compared with SRVR:
SRVR vs. DTCRSRVR vs. VNQSRVR vs. EQIXSRVR vs. INDSSRVR vs. REETSRVR vs. VPNSRVR vs. VRNS

Return for Risk

QQQ vs. SRVR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
SRVR
SRVR Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
SRVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRVR Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
SRVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRVR Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQ vs. SRVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

QQQSRVRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.09
0.47

+1.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.73
0.77

+1.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.09

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.01

0.55

+2.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.22

1.17

+10.05

QQQ vs. SRVR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is higher than the SRVR Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQ and SRVR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQQ vs. SRVR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQ drawdown since its inception was -82.97%, which is greater than SRVR's maximum drawdown of -40.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQ and SRVR.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

QQQSRVRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.97%

-40.99%

-41.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.96%

-14.78%

+2.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.77%

-18.34%

-4.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.12%

-40.99%

+5.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.12%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.33%

-13.12%

+9.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.75%

-15.25%

-17.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.20%

6.89%

-3.69%

Volatility

QQQ vs. SRVR - Volatility Comparison

Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a higher volatility of 7.56% compared to Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR) at 6.23%. This indicates that QQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SRVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

QQQSRVRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.56%

6.23%

+1.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.81%

13.72%

+0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.19%

17.26%

-0.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.55%

19.77%

+2.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.38%

21.46%

+0.92%

QQQ vs. SRVR - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQ has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than SRVR's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQQ vs. SRVR - Dividend Comparison

QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than SRVR's 2.57% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF		0.39%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%
SRVR
Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF		2.57%2.67%2.00%3.69%1.70%1.19%1.59%1.61%2.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

QQQ and SRVR have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQ has higher volatility (7.56%) compared to SRVR (6.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQ dropped -82.97% vs SRVR's -40.99%.

On 5-year performance, QQQ leads with 16.85% vs -1.65% for SRVR. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, SRVR has been the lower-risk option at 6.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 16.85% return vs -1.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SRVR.

SRVR has the higher dividend yield at 2.57%, compared with 0.39% for QQQ.

QQQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SRVR is REIT. QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while SRVR tracks Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for QQQ and 0.60% for SRVR.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQ and SRVR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer