QQQ vs. SIL
QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) and SIL (Global X Silver Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while SIL is a Silver fund tracking the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QQQ returned 21.59%/yr vs 9.24%/yr for SIL. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QQQ charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for SIL.
Performance
QQQ vs. SIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQ achieves a 16.71% return, which is significantly higher than SIL's -4.72% return. Over the past 10 years, QQQ has outperformed SIL with an annualized return of 21.59%, while SIL has yielded a comparatively lower 9.24% annualized return.
QQQ
- 1D
- 1.56%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- 16.71%
- 6M
- 15.00%
- 1Y
- 35.78%
- 3Y*
- 27.15%
- 5Y*
- 16.98%
- 10Y*
- 21.59%
SIL
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- -18.16%
- YTD
- -4.72%
- 6M
- 7.62%
- 1Y
- 66.61%
- 3Y*
- 44.84%
- 5Y*
- 12.27%
- 10Y*
- 9.24%
QQQ vs. SIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 16.71% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF | -4.72% | 166.16% | 14.62% | 1.31% | -22.83% | -18.35% | 40.30% | 34.78% | -22.42% | 1.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQ and SIL is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2010 | 0.27 |
The correlation between QQQ and SIL shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (10 years) to 0.38 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
QQQ vs. SIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QQQ
SIL
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
QQQ
SIL
-
Communication Services
QQQ
SIL
-
Consumer Cyclical
QQQ
SIL
-
Consumer Defensive
QQQ
SIL
Healthcare
QQQ
SIL
-
Industrials
QQQ
SIL
-
Utilities
QQQ
SIL
-
Basic Materials
QQQ
SIL
Energy
QQQ
SIL
-
Financial Services
QQQ
SIL
-
Real Estate
QQQ
SIL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQ vs. SIL — Risk / Return Rank
QQQ
SIL
QQQ vs. SIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQQ | SIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.24 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.00 | 2.03 | +0.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.43 | 5.05 | +6.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQQ | SIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.15 | 1.31 | +0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 0.31 | +0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 | 0.23 | +0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.12 | +0.28 |
Drawdowns
QQQ vs. SIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQ drawdown since its inception was -82.97%, roughly equal to the maximum SIL drawdown of -82.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQ and SIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQ | SIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.97% | -82.99% | +0.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.96% | -32.91% | +20.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.77% | -32.91% | +10.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.12% | -55.08% | +19.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.12% | -63.04% | +27.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.03% | -32.58% | +28.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.77% | -51.43% | +18.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 13.24% | -10.10% |
Volatility
QQQ vs. SIL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) is 6.84%, while Global X Silver Miners ETF (SIL) has a volatility of 18.38%. This indicates that QQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQ | SIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.84% | 18.38% | -11.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.20% | 43.02% | -29.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.74% | 51.09% | -34.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.49% | 39.48% | -16.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.36% | 39.73% | -17.37% |
QQQ vs. SIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQ has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than SIL's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQQ vs. SIL - Dividend Comparison
QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than SIL's 1.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF | 1.24% | 1.18% | 2.40% | 0.59% | 0.48% | 1.59% | 1.92% | 1.53% | 1.21% | 0.02% | 3.34% | 0.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQ and SIL have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SIL has higher volatility (18.38%) compared to QQQ (6.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQ dropped -82.97% vs SIL's -82.99%.
On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 21.59% vs 9.24% for SIL. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 6.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 21.59% return vs 9.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SIL.
SIL has the higher dividend yield at 1.24%, compared with 0.39% for QQQ.
QQQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while SIL is Silver. QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while SIL tracks Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for QQQ and 0.65% for SIL.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQQ and SIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer