QQQ vs. QQQG

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) and QQQG (Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. QQQ is passively managed, while QQQG is actively managed. Over the past year, QQQ returned 40.74% vs 41.31% for QQQG. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QQQ charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for QQQG.

Performance

QQQ vs. QQQG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQ achieves a 20.71% return, which is significantly lower than QQQG's 31.21% return.

QQQ

• 1D: -0.48%
• 1M: 8.66%
• YTD: 20.71%
• 6M: 19.19%
• 1Y: 40.74%
• 3Y*: 28.54%
• 5Y*: 17.86%
• 10Y*: 21.84%

QQQG

• 1D: -0.92%
• 1M: 14.49%
• YTD: 31.21%
• 6M: 28.95%
• 1Y: 41.31%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQ vs. QQQG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF	20.71%	20.77%	6.77%
QQQG Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF	31.21%	14.72%	2.23%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQ and QQQG is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2024	0.90

The correlation between QQQ and QQQG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

QQQ vs. QQQG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QQQ	QQQG
Technology	53.8%	68.6%
Communication Services	15.8%	10.2%
Consumer Cyclical	12.3%	3.6%
Consumer Defensive	7.7%	1.5%
Healthcare	4.2%	12.1%
Industrials	2.8%	2.6%
Utilities	1.4%	-
Basic Materials	1.1%	-
Energy	0.6%	1.4%
Financial Services	0.2%	-
Real Estate	0.1%	-

Return for Risk

QQQ vs. QQQG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQ

QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 74
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 75
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 71

QQQG

QQQG Risk / Return Rank: 62
QQQG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
QQQG Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
QQQG Omega Ratio Rank: 60
QQQG Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
QQQG Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQ vs. QQQG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QQQ	QQQG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.57	2.11	+0.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.37	2.81	+0.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.36	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.42	3.01	+0.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.14	10.82	+2.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QQQ vs. QQQG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.57, which is comparable to the QQQG Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQ and QQQG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QQQ	QQQG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.57	2.11	+0.46
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.98	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.41	1.17	-0.76

Drawdowns

QQQ vs. QQQG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQ drawdown since its inception was -82.97%, which is greater than QQQG's maximum drawdown of -23.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQ and QQQG.

Drawdown Indicators

	QQQ	QQQG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-82.97%	-23.61%	-59.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.96%	-13.79%	+1.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.77%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.12%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.12%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.74%	-0.92%	+0.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.78%	-3.59%	-29.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.11%	3.83%	-0.72%

Volatility

QQQ vs. QQQG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) is 4.51%, while Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) has a volatility of 5.39%. This indicates that QQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QQQ	QQQG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.51%	5.39%	-0.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.10%	16.05%	-3.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.94%	19.67%	-3.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.37%	23.40%	-1.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.29%	23.40%	-1.11%

QQQ vs. QQQG - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQ has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQG's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

QQQ vs. QQQG - Dividend Comparison

QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, more than QQQG's 0.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF	0.38%	0.45%	0.56%	0.62%	0.80%	0.43%	0.55%	0.74%	0.91%	0.84%	1.06%	0.99%
QQQG Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF	0.06%	0.06%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QQQ and QQQG in my portfolio?

QQQ and QQQG have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QQQ or QQQG?

QQQG has higher volatility (5.39%) compared to QQQ (4.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQ dropped -82.97% vs QQQG's -23.61%.

Which ETF is better, QQQ or QQQG?

On 1-year performance, QQQG leads with 41.31% vs 40.74% for QQQ. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QQQ or QQQG?

Over the 1-year period, QQQG has performed better with a 41.31% return vs 40.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QQQ or QQQG?

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for QQQG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QQQ or QQQG?

QQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.06% for QQQG.

What is the main difference between QQQ and QQQG?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for QQQ and 0.49% for QQQG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.