PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QQQ vs. JSMD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QQQ vs. JSMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQ achieves a 21.26% return, which is significantly higher than JSMD's 19.55% return. Over the past 10 years, QQQ has outperformed JSMD with an annualized return of 22.31%, while JSMD has yielded a comparatively lower 13.87% annualized return.


QQQ

1D
3.14%
1M
4.95%
YTD
21.26%
6M
22.17%
1Y
41.87%
3Y*
27.20%
5Y*
17.59%
10Y*
22.31%

JSMD

1D
1.27%
1M
6.04%
YTD
19.55%
6M
17.80%
1Y
31.95%
3Y*
17.83%
5Y*
8.38%
10Y*
13.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQ vs. JSMD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
21.26%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%
JSMD
Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF
19.55%9.25%15.08%26.81%-22.84%8.40%30.79%31.05%-4.73%24.46%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQ and JSMD is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2016

0.73

The correlation between QQQ and JSMD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

QQQ vs. JSMD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QQQ
JSMD

Technology

58.7%
28.1%

Communication Services

14.3%
2.9%

Consumer Cyclical

11.4%
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

6.4%
2.5%

Healthcare

3.7%
18.7%

Industrials

2.6%
23.3%

Utilities

1.2%

-

Basic Materials

1.0%
3.0%

Energy

0.5%
1.1%

Financial Services

0.2%
8.9%

Real Estate

0.1%
2.8%

Technology

QQQ
58.7%
JSMD
28.1%

Communication Services

QQQ
14.3%
JSMD
2.9%

Consumer Cyclical

QQQ
11.4%
JSMD
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

QQQ
6.4%
JSMD
2.5%

Healthcare

QQQ
3.7%
JSMD
18.7%

Industrials

QQQ
2.6%
JSMD
23.3%

Utilities

QQQ
1.2%
JSMD

-

Basic Materials

QQQ
1.0%
JSMD
3.0%

Energy

QQQ
0.5%
JSMD
1.1%

Financial Services

QQQ
0.2%
JSMD
8.9%

Real Estate

QQQ
0.1%
JSMD
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QQQ vs. JSMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

JSMD
JSMD Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
JSMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JSMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
JSMD Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
JSMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
JSMD Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQ vs. JSMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QQQJSMDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.26

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.52

2.16

+1.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.12

7.31

+5.81

QQQ vs. JSMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is higher than the JSMD Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQ and JSMD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QQQ vs. JSMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQ drawdown since its inception was -82.97%, which is greater than JSMD's maximum drawdown of -38.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQ and JSMD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QQQJSMDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.97%

-38.98%

-43.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.96%

-14.86%

+2.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.77%

-24.01%

+1.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.12%

-32.18%

-2.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.12%

-38.98%

+3.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

0.00%

-0.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.75%

-7.46%

-25.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.20%

4.38%

-1.18%

Volatility

QQQ vs. JSMD - Volatility Comparison

Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD) have volatilities of 8.14% and 8.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QQQJSMDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.14%

8.24%

-0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.12%

17.21%

-3.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.43%

21.80%

-4.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.59%

22.99%

-0.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.41%

22.83%

-0.42%

QQQ vs. JSMD - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQ has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than JSMD's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

QQQ vs. JSMD - Dividend Comparison

QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than JSMD's 0.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JSMD
Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF
0.46%0.54%0.76%0.44%0.40%0.28%0.24%0.32%0.53%0.30%0.36%0.00%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.38%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


QQQ and JSMD have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JSMD has higher volatility (8.24%) compared to QQQ (8.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQ dropped -82.97% vs JSMD's -38.98%.

On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 22.31% vs 13.87% for JSMD. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 8.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 22.31% return vs 13.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for JSMD.

JSMD has the higher dividend yield at 0.46%, compared with 0.38% for QQQ.

QQQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while JSMD is Mid Cap Growth Equities. QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while JSMD tracks Janus Small Mid Cap Growth Alpha Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Janus Henderson. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for QQQ and 0.30% for JSMD.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQ and JSMD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer