QQQ vs. JSMD
QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) and JSMD (Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while JSMD is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Janus Small Mid Cap Growth Alpha Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QQQ returned 22.31%/yr vs 13.87%/yr for JSMD. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QQQ charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for JSMD.
Performance
QQQ vs. JSMD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQ achieves a 21.26% return, which is significantly higher than JSMD's 19.55% return. Over the past 10 years, QQQ has outperformed JSMD with an annualized return of 22.31%, while JSMD has yielded a comparatively lower 13.87% annualized return.
QQQ
- 1D
- 3.14%
- 1M
- 4.95%
- YTD
- 21.26%
- 6M
- 22.17%
- 1Y
- 41.87%
- 3Y*
- 27.20%
- 5Y*
- 17.59%
- 10Y*
- 22.31%
JSMD
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- 6.04%
- YTD
- 19.55%
- 6M
- 17.80%
- 1Y
- 31.95%
- 3Y*
- 17.83%
- 5Y*
- 8.38%
- 10Y*
- 13.87%
QQQ vs. JSMD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 21.26% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
JSMD Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF | 19.55% | 9.25% | 15.08% | 26.81% | -22.84% | 8.40% | 30.79% | 31.05% | -4.73% | 24.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQ and JSMD is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2016 | 0.73 |
The correlation between QQQ and JSMD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
QQQ vs. JSMD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QQQ
JSMD
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
Technology
QQQ
JSMD
Communication Services
QQQ
JSMD
Consumer Cyclical
QQQ
JSMD
Consumer Defensive
QQQ
JSMD
Healthcare
QQQ
JSMD
Industrials
QQQ
JSMD
Utilities
QQQ
JSMD
-
Basic Materials
QQQ
JSMD
Energy
QQQ
JSMD
Financial Services
QQQ
JSMD
Real Estate
QQQ
JSMD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQ vs. JSMD — Risk / Return Rank
QQQ
JSMD
QQQ vs. JSMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QQQ | JSMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.26 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.52 | 2.16 | +1.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.12 | 7.31 | +5.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QQQ vs. JSMD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQ drawdown since its inception was -82.97%, which is greater than JSMD's maximum drawdown of -38.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQ and JSMD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQ | JSMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.97% | -38.98% | -43.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.96% | -14.86% | +2.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.77% | -24.01% | +1.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.12% | -32.18% | -2.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.12% | -38.98% | +3.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.29% | 0.00% | -0.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.75% | -7.46% | -25.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.20% | 4.38% | -1.18% |
Volatility
QQQ vs. JSMD - Volatility Comparison
Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD) have volatilities of 8.14% and 8.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQ | JSMD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.14% | 8.24% | -0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.12% | 17.21% | -3.09% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.43% | 21.80% | -4.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.59% | 22.99% | -0.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.41% | 22.83% | -0.42% |
QQQ vs. JSMD - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQ has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than JSMD's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
QQQ vs. JSMD - Dividend Comparison
QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than JSMD's 0.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JSMD Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF | 0.46% | 0.54% | 0.76% | 0.44% | 0.40% | 0.28% | 0.24% | 0.32% | 0.53% | 0.30% | 0.36% | 0.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.38% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQ and JSMD have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JSMD has higher volatility (8.24%) compared to QQQ (8.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQ dropped -82.97% vs JSMD's -38.98%.
On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 22.31% vs 13.87% for JSMD. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 8.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 22.31% return vs 13.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for JSMD.
JSMD has the higher dividend yield at 0.46%, compared with 0.38% for QQQ.
QQQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while JSMD is Mid Cap Growth Equities. QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while JSMD tracks Janus Small Mid Cap Growth Alpha Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Janus Henderson. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for QQQ and 0.30% for JSMD.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQQ and JSMD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer