QQQ vs. IUSB
QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) and IUSB (iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while IUSB is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Universal Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QQQ returned 21.59%/yr vs 1.88%/yr for IUSB. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QQQ charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for IUSB.
Performance
QQQ vs. IUSB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QQQ achieves a 16.71% return, which is significantly higher than IUSB's 0.04% return. Over the past 10 years, QQQ has outperformed IUSB with an annualized return of 21.59%, while IUSB has yielded a comparatively lower 1.88% annualized return.
QQQ
- 1D
- 1.56%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- 16.71%
- 6M
- 15.00%
- 1Y
- 35.78%
- 3Y*
- 27.15%
- 5Y*
- 16.98%
- 10Y*
- 21.59%
IUSB
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -0.67%
- YTD
- 0.04%
- 6M
- 0.37%
- 1Y
- 5.22%
- 3Y*
- 4.40%
- 5Y*
- 0.29%
- 10Y*
- 1.88%
QQQ vs. IUSB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 16.71% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
IUSB iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF | 0.04% | 7.38% | 2.11% | 6.23% | -13.04% | -1.33% | 7.62% | 9.13% | -0.27% | 3.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between QQQ and IUSB is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2014 | 0.09 |
The correlation between QQQ and IUSB shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (all time) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
QQQ vs. IUSB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QQQ
IUSB
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
QQQ
IUSB
-
Communication Services
QQQ
IUSB
-
Consumer Cyclical
QQQ
IUSB
-
Consumer Defensive
QQQ
IUSB
-
Healthcare
QQQ
IUSB
-
Industrials
QQQ
IUSB
-
Utilities
QQQ
IUSB
-
Basic Materials
QQQ
IUSB
-
Energy
QQQ
IUSB
Financial Services
QQQ
IUSB
-
Real Estate
QQQ
IUSB
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QQQ vs. IUSB — Risk / Return Rank
QQQ
IUSB
QQQ vs. IUSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF (IUSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QQQ | IUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.26 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.00 | 2.07 | +0.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.43 | 6.19 | +5.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QQQ | IUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.15 | 1.47 | +0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 | 0.05 | +0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 | 0.37 | +0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.45 | -0.05 |
Drawdowns
QQQ vs. IUSB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QQQ drawdown since its inception was -82.97%, which is greater than IUSB's maximum drawdown of -17.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQ and IUSB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QQQ | IUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.97% | -17.90% | -65.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.96% | -2.53% | -9.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.77% | -5.82% | -16.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.12% | -17.87% | -17.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.12% | -17.90% | -17.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.03% | -1.71% | -2.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.77% | -3.59% | -29.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.14% | 0.85% | +2.29% |
Volatility
QQQ vs. IUSB - Volatility Comparison
Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a higher volatility of 6.84% compared to iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF (IUSB) at 1.21%. This indicates that QQQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IUSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QQQ | IUSB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.84% | 1.21% | +5.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.20% | 2.64% | +10.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.74% | 3.57% | +13.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.49% | 5.80% | +16.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.36% | 5.04% | +17.32% |
QQQ vs. IUSB - Expense Ratio Comparison
QQQ has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than IUSB's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
QQQ vs. IUSB - Dividend Comparison
QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than IUSB's 4.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IUSB iShares Core Universal USD Bond ETF | 4.25% | 4.17% | 4.04% | 3.46% | 2.53% | 1.74% | 2.68% | 3.04% | 2.98% | 2.56% | 2.60% | 1.95% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.39% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QQQ and IUSB have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQ has higher volatility (6.84%) compared to IUSB (1.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QQQ dropped -82.97% vs IUSB's -17.90%.
On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 21.59% vs 1.88% for IUSB. On fees, IUSB is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IUSB has been the lower-risk option at 1.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 21.59% return vs 1.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IUSB is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for QQQ.
IUSB has the higher dividend yield at 4.25%, compared with 0.39% for QQQ.
QQQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while IUSB is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while IUSB tracks Bloomberg U.S. Universal Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for QQQ and 0.06% for IUSB.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QQQ and IUSB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer