PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
QQQ vs. IITU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

QQQ vs. IITU.L

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) and IITU.L (iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while IITU.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QQQ returned 21.27%/yr vs 25.85%/yr for IITU.L. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QQQ charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for IITU.L.

Performance

QQQ vs. IITU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

QQQ is traded in USD, while IITU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IITU.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QQQ achieves a 14.92% return, which is significantly lower than IITU.L's 18.75% return. Over the past 10 years, QQQ has underperformed IITU.L with an annualized return of 21.27%, while IITU.L has yielded a comparatively higher 25.85% annualized return.

QQQ

1D
-4.80%
1M
1.34%
YTD
14.92%
6M
13.01%
1Y
35.00%
3Y*
26.46%
5Y*
16.70%
10Y*
21.27%

IITU.L

1D
-3.42%
1M
6.84%
YTD
18.75%
6M
18.13%
1Y
45.51%
3Y*
33.37%
5Y*
23.32%
10Y*
25.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QQQ vs. IITU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF		14.92%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%
IITU.L
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		18.75%23.07%38.50%58.65%-29.11%34.44%42.58%49.99%-1.62%37.53%

Correlation

The correlation between QQQ and IITU.L is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 23, 2015

0.62

The correlation between QQQ and IITU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

QQQ vs. IITU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
QQQ
IITU.L

Technology

53.8%
99.6%

Communication Services

15.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

12.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

7.7%

-

Healthcare

4.2%

-

Industrials

2.8%
0.0%

Utilities

1.4%

-

Basic Materials

1.1%

-

Energy

0.6%
0.1%

Financial Services

0.2%

-

Real Estate

0.1%

-

Technology

QQQ
53.8%
IITU.L
99.6%

Communication Services

QQQ
15.8%
IITU.L

-

Consumer Cyclical

QQQ
12.3%
IITU.L

-

Consumer Defensive

QQQ
7.7%
IITU.L

-

Healthcare

QQQ
4.2%
IITU.L

-

Industrials

QQQ
2.8%
IITU.L
0.0%

Utilities

QQQ
1.4%
IITU.L

-

Basic Materials

QQQ
1.1%
IITU.L

-

Energy

QQQ
0.6%
IITU.L
0.1%

Financial Services

QQQ
0.2%
IITU.L

-

Real Estate

QQQ
0.1%
IITU.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Invesco QQQ ETF

iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)

Often compared with QQQ:
QQQ vs. SPYQQQ vs. VOOQQQ vs. VGTQQQ vs. TQQQQQQ vs. SMHQQQ vs. QQQMQQQ vs. QQQI
Often compared with IITU.L:
IITU.L vs. VGTIITU.L vs. CNX1.LIITU.L vs. VUAG.LIITU.L vs. XLKIITU.L vs. SMGB.LIITU.L vs. XLKQ.LIITU.L vs. VUSA.AS

Return for Risk

QQQ vs. IITU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
IITU.L
IITU.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
IITU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IITU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
IITU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
IITU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
IITU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QQQ vs. IITU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

QQQIITU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.11
2.23

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.72
2.95

-0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.36

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.94

2.70

+0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.22

8.10

+3.12

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QQQ vs. IITU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QQQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the IITU.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QQQ and IITU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

QQQIITU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.11

2.23

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

0.86

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

1.08

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.75

-0.35

Drawdowns

QQQ vs. IITU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QQQ drawdown since its inception was -82.97%, which is greater than IITU.L's maximum drawdown of -43.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QQQ and IITU.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

QQQIITU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.97%

-43.85%

-39.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.96%

-16.80%

+4.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.77%

-26.42%

+3.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.12%

-34.22%

-0.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.12%

-34.22%

-0.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.51%

-6.51%

+1.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.78%

-10.62%

-22.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.13%

5.60%

-2.47%

Volatility

QQQ vs. IITU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) is 6.68%, while iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) has a volatility of 7.83%. This indicates that QQQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IITU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

QQQIITU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.68%

7.83%

-1.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.12%

15.52%

-2.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.69%

20.37%

-3.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.47%

27.15%

-4.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.34%

24.13%

-1.79%

QQQ vs. IITU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

QQQ has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than IITU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

QQQ vs. IITU.L - Dividend Comparison

QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, while IITU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IITU.L
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF		0.40%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions

QQQ and IITU.L have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IITU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IITU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for QQQ.

QQQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while IITU.L is Technology Equities. QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while IITU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for QQQ and 0.15% for IITU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QQQ and IITU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer